Polynema (Polynema) striaticorne Girault 1911
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Polynema (Polynema) striaticorne Girault, 1911 Polynema striaticorne Girault, 1911 [72]: 12. Syntypes ♀, ♂ (USNM). TL: USA, New York, Albany. Hodgkiss, 1910: 81, 91 [nomen nudum] (host, distribution); Girault, 1911 [87]: 149 (mention); Girault, 1911 [89]: 139 (contrast with extralimital species); Girault, 1911 [95]: 365 (contrast with extralimital species); Girault, 1911 [96]: 302 (distribution, description), 319 (key); Girault, 1912 [109]: 23 (distribution, distribution); Girault, 1912 [112]: 298 (Girault, 1911 [96]: 300 corrected); Girault, 1912 [135]: 14 (mention); Girault, 1915 [261]: 8 (distribution); Brittain, 1917: 39 (host, distribution); Funkhouser, 1917: 415 (host, distribution); Brittain, 1918: 19 (host, distribution); Washburn, 1919: 193 (distribution); Underhill, 1926: 17 (host, distribution); Frison, 1927: 228 (paratype listing); Balduf, 1928: 422 (biology); Sorenson, 1928: 16 (percent parasitism); Essig, 1929: 818 (hosts, distribution); Girault, 1929 [428]: 19 (key), 28 (contrast with P. nativum); Walley, 1929: 194 (contrast with P. pratensiphagum); Burks, 1938: 161 (fore wing figure); Clausen, 1940: 100, 101, 103 (life cycle); Craighead, 1950: 619 (life cycle, host, percent parasitism); Peck, 1951: 418 (catalogue); Thompson, 1958: 572 (host catalogue); Jackson, 1961b: 278 (larva); Peck, 1963: 48 (catalogue); Vidano, 1966: 55 (introduction) [P]; Anderson & Paschke, 1968: 4 (mention); Vidano, 1968a: 3 (introduction) [P]; Vidano, 1968b: 581 (phenology) [P]; Prota, 1970: 55 (mention) [P]; Viggiani, 1974a: 155 (host) [P]; Currado, 1975: 335 (spread in Italy) [P]; Vidano & Meotto, 1975: 297 (multiplication, dissemination) [P]; Bournier, 1976: 362 (mention) [P]; Ciampolini et al., 1977: 25204 (biological control) [P]; Burks, 1979: 1033 (catalogue); Cookson & New, 1980: 8 (mention); Huber, 1986: 197 (biological control) [P]; Alma et al., 1988: 597 (host, Italy) [P]; Viggiani & Jesu, 1988: 1024 (biocontrol) [P]; Pantaleoni, 1989: 5 (biocontrol) [P]; Yoshimoto, 1990: 83 (list); Schedl, 1991: 10 (biological control) [P]; Boivin et al., 1993: 179 (larval instar number); Fursov, 1994: 12 (distribution) [P]; Nénon et al., 1995: 997 (larval instar number); Pagliano et al., 1995: 36 (list [P]; Isidoro et al., 1996: 216 (gustatory sensilla) [P]; Lenteren et al., 2003: 28 (risk assessment) [P]; Viggiani, 2004: 69 (male genitalia) [P]; Pantaleoni & Tavella, 2006: 140 (biocontrol) [P]; Bennett, 2008a: 677 (larva description); Mills, 2010: 395 (biological control, minimal impact) [P]; Rasplus et al., 2010: 674 (alien in Europe) [P]; Roy et al., 2011: 492 (1966 European introduction) [P]; Świerczewski & Stroiński, 2011: 18 (biological control) [P]; Pintureau, 2012: 30 (list) [P]; Zandigiacomo et al., 2017: 68 (introduction) [P]. Cosmocoma sp.: Marlatt, 1895: 12 (host, distribution) [identified by Girault, 1911 [72]: 15]. Polynema (Cosmocoma) n. sp.: Girault, 1907 [27]: 30 (host) [identified by Girault, 1911 [87]: 149]. Cosmocoma maculipes: Nason, 1906: 8 [misidentification (Girault [96]: 308)] (list). Polynema howardii [misidentification (Girault, 1912 [112]: 298)]: Girault, 1911 [96]: 300 (distribution). Polynema striaticorniss [sic]: Felt, 1915: 89, 176 (hosts, distribution). Polynema striaticorna [sic]: Smith, 1923: 55 (host, distribution). Polynema? striaticorne: MacGown & Osgood, 1972: 1264 (mention). Polynema Striaticorne [sic]: Waloff & Jervis, 1987: 292 (male aggression). Polynema batiashvili Elerdashvili, 1987: 81. Lectotype ♀ (ZIN), designated by Fursov, 1994: 13. TL: Georgia, Mtskheta- Mtianeti Region, Dusheti. Synonymy by Fursov, 1994: 13. Nearctic hosts. Membracidae: Ceresa borealis (Fairmaire), C. bubalus (Fabricius), C. taurina (Fitch), Oncopsis sobrius (Walker), Stictocephala inermis (Fabricius). Distribution. Canada: BC, NS. USA: CO, DC, ID, IL, IN, KS, MD, MN, MO, NY, TX, VA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.065 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".