Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ophiodes gracilis Fraser, 1914a Ophiodes gracilis Fraser, 1914a: 171, pl. 22, figs. 82A–D. Diplocyathus gracilis.— Leloup, 1930: 6. Ophiodissa gracilis.— Fraser, 1937a: 114, pl. 23, figs. 129a–d. Plumularia magellanica moneroni Naumov, 1960: 462, fig. 351. Not Hydrodendron gracilis.— Millard, 1973: 973: 33, figs. 6F, G; 1975: 164, figs. 53E–J. Hydrodendron gracile.— Rees & Vervoort, 1987: 20. Type material. None known to exist. Type locality. Canada, British Columbia: Clarke Rock; Pylades Channel; Rose Spit (Graham Island, Haida Gwaii) (Fraser 1914a). Current status. Valid, as Hydrodendron gracile (Fraser, 1914a), although the species needs reassessment. Remarks. The only material of Ophiodes gracilis Fraser, 1914a in the Fraser Hydroid Collection at the RBCM (BCPM 976-00510-001: Canada, British Columbia, Houston Stewart Channel) is not from any of the type localities listed by Fraser (1914a) and is not part of the type series. Instead, it is from later collections made in Houston Stewart Channel, a passage separating Moresby and Kunghit islands in the Queen Charlotte Islands (=Haida Gwaii) (Fraser 1936b). Fraser’s (1914a) account of this hydroid, assigned by Rees & Vervoort (1987) to Hydrodendron Hincks, 1874 as H. gracile, was based on sterile material. Specimens examined by Antsulevich (1987, 2015) from the Pacific coast of the Russian Federation lacked gonophores as well. Meanwhile, fertile hydroids assigned to the species by Millard (1973, 1975, as H. gracilis) are unlikely to have been conspecific. Indeed, records of H. gracile outside the boreal North Pacific, and especially from tropical waters, need to be re-considered. Hydroids of this species, identified as Plumularia magellanica moneroni by Naumov (1960) from Tatar Strait (Gulf of Tatary), Russian Federation, are almost certain to be distinct from Plumularia magellanica Hartlaub, 1905 (= Kirchenpaueria magellanica) (Horia R. Galea, personal communication, 22 March 2018). Naumov’s specimens were also sterile. The species was included as H. gracile in Cairns et al. (2002), following Rees & Vervoort (1987), and as H. gracilis in the current WoRMS list. When combined with the genus Hydrodendron (gender: neuter), the specific name must agree in gender and becomes gracile instead of gracilis (Rees & Vervoort 1987).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".