К вопросу о принадлежности земли Атлантического побережья Северной Америки «де-юре» с 1494 г. по 1525 г. и исследованием ее «де-факто» Португалией и Англией в конце XIV в. – начале XV в./ About the question of the ownership of the land of the Atlantic coast of North America "de jure" from 1494 to 1525 and the study of its "de facto" by Portugal and England at the end of the XIV century – the beginning of the XV century. Америки «де-юре» с 1494 г. по 1525 г. и исследованием ее «де-факто» Португалией и Англией в конце XIV в. – начале XV в.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
В работе рассматривается история инициации и начало исследований моряками Англии и Португалии побережья нынешнего североамериканского континента, рассмотрены вопросы создания поселений на территории нынешней Канады. Также указываются обстоятельства исследований и люди, которые совершили экспедиции и способствовали передачи знаний, маршрутов и навигационного опыта, полученного в результате этих исследований. Приведено авторское предположение (гипотеза) и создана карта пути следования экспедиции Джона Кабота на основе последних исследований и согласования этого на основе имеющихся знаний науки о течении Гольфстрима и других течений в Атлантике. The paper examines the history of initiation and the beginning of explorations by the sailors of England and Portugal of the coast of the current North American continent, discusses the creation of settlements on the territory of present-day Canada. The circumstances of the research and the people who made the expeditions and contributed to the transfer of knowledge, routes and navigation experience gained as a result of these studies are also indicated. The author's assumption (hypothesis) of the route of the John Cabot expedition is given on the basis of recent research and coordination of this on the basis of existing knowledge of the science of the Gulf Stream and other currents in the Atlantic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".