MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6931495193 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5618941

Sebastidae

2016· article· en· W6931495193 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMediterranean climateRidgeContinental shelfMediterranean seaRange (aeronautics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Family Sebastidae Helicolenus dactylopterus (Delaroche, 1809) —Blackbelly rosefish 2 specimens were caught at depths between 704 and 869 m. Only one individual of 37 cm TL was measured. Habitat and Distribution: bathydemersal in soft bottom areas of the continental shelf and upper slope, at depth range 50–1,100 m, usually 150– 600 m. Western Atlantic, from Canada to Venezuela and eastern Atlantic, from Iceland and Norway to South Africa and in the Mediterranean Sea. Vulnerability: DD (IUCN), MHV (FishBase). Trachyscorpia cristulata echinata (Koehler, 1896) —Spiny scorpionfish 1,105 specimens were caught at depths between 709 and 1,323 m. Length data were available for 267 specimens ranging from 12 to 50 cm TL (37.4±8.7). Biometry and meristic: 4 specimens, 392–506 mm TL, 336– 418 mm SL; HL: 43.6–47.1; PO: 11.2–14.4; POL: 23.2–24.5; ED: 8.9–10.1; IOW: 4.7–5.5; PD: 33.5–41.1; LD: 46.7–50.3; PA: 68.7–74.2; LA: 11.2–13.2; PP: 42.9–44.3; PV: 39.3–41.8; LP: 21.3–24.9; LV: 14.4–17.6; H: 29.9– 32.5; D: XII+9; A: III+5; P: 20–21; V: I+5; Gr: 6+12–13. Habitat and Distribution: bathydemersal on muddy and sandy bottoms between 200 and 2,500 m. Eastern Atlantic, from Ireland to Senegal, Mid-Atlantic Ridge and in the Mediterranean Sea. Vulnerability: DD (IUCN), HHV (FishBase).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.104
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1040.042

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes→French-language works237,207→