Bibliographic record
Abstract
Roederiodes wigginsi Wilder (Fig. 31) Roederiodes wigginsi Wilder, 1981: 417. Type locality: Cocos Island [05°32′N 87°02′W], Costa Rica. Type material. HOLOTYPE ♀, labelled: “ COSTA RICA:/ ISLA DEL COCO/ Bahía del Chatham / 22-I-1967 / Ira L. Wiggins ”; HOLOTYPE/ Roederiodes / wigginsi/ 1980 Wilder [red label]”; California Academy/ of Sciences/ Type No. 13622” (CAS) [one wing missing; one wing mounted on microscope slide (No. 13622)]. Recognition. This species is very similar to R. notialis sp. nov., with the arista-like stylus twice longer than the pedicel and well developed scutal setae. Without associated males, species identification is mostly dependent on geographic locality. Redescription. Wing length 2.3 mm. Female. Face and gena brown. Ocellar setae divergent, slender, shorter than pprn; vertical seta stronger than ocellar seta. Antenna with stylus twice as long as length of postpedicel; postpedicel ovate, not prolonged apically. Length of proboscis three-quarter head height. Pleura brown, with postpronotal lobe and postalar ridge paler; prescutellar depression without pruinescence; acr damaged; 5 dc, well-developed; 1 pprn; 1 presut spal with several setulae; 2 npl with several anterior setulae; 0 psut spal; pal and sctl damaged; laterotergite with patch of setae; antepronotum with several setulae; lower proepisternum with pale setae. Wing infuscate (see Wilder 1981, fig. 1); cell dm pointed apically, with base of M 1 and M 2 coalesced basally for short distance, subequal in length to crossvein r-m. Legs dark brown; coxae slightly paler, without bluish pruinescence. Hind tibia without enlarged ventral setae. Abdominal tergites dark brown, without bluish pruinescence; bearing short black setae. Male. Unknown. Distribution. This species is known only from Cocos Is., Costa Rica (Fig. 31). Remarks. Associated males of this species are unknown and accurate identification of R. wigginsi must await their discovery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".