MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6931504829 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6277100

Odontophotopsis Viereck

2003· article· en· W6931504829 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCell Adhesion Molecules Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPedicelMandible (arthropod mouthpart)ScapeGenusKeelHolotypeDorsum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Odontophotopsis Viereck Type species. Odontophotopsis exogyrus Viereck, orig. desig. Female. Head. As wide as thorax. Eyes slightly projecting, oval, finely but clearly faceted. Clypeus anterior edge emarginate medially, base swollen medially. Antennal scrobe lacking dorsal carina. Antennal tubercle well developed, separated by distance equal to width of single tubercle, transversely rugose. Antenna 12­segmented. Pedicel and flagellomere II subequal in length, flagellomere I slightly longer than pedicel (Fig. 1). Mandible bidentate apically (Fig. 2). Dorsal margin of mandible lacking prominent carina (Fig. 2). Ventral margin of mandible emarginate on basal third with distinct basal tooth (Fig. 2). Genal carina absent. Maxillary palpus 6­segmented, labial palpus 4­segmented. Decumbent plumose pubescence present on frons and vertex. Mesosoma. Pyriform, slightly longer than wide, widest medially (Fig. 4). Anterolateral margin of pronotum slightly angulate with vertical carina (Fig. 3). Scutellar scale present with lateral carina connecting scale to propodeal spiracle tubercles (Figs. 3, 4). Propodeum with distinct disk and declivity regions (Fig. 3). Decumbent plumose pubescence present on metasomal dorsum. Femora of all legs rounded apically. Tibial spurs pectinate. Metasoma. First segment subsessile with respect to second, slightly disciform posteriorly (Fig. 5). T2 with lateral felt line. S2 flattened medially, without lateral felt line. T6 with pygidial area defined laterally by carinae. Plumose pubescence present both on surface of tergites and as dense apical fringes. Distribution. Western North America, east to Arkansas, from B.C. Canada south into Central America (Northern Costa Rica). Comments. The genus Odontophotopsis is in the subfamily Sphaeropthalminae (Sphaeropthalmini). Males of Odontophotopsis can be separated from other Sphaeropthalmini by the presence of large ocelli, simple spine­like sternal processes (absent in O. mamata Schuster and in some specimens of species in the O. tapajos speciesgroup), usually with weak sculpturing and the integumental surface polished, presence of incomplete parapsidal furrows (complete in O. fallax Viereck and O. pudica (Melander)), absence of or very short felt lines on the second sternite, presence of well­developed plumose pubescence (especially on the abdomen), and presence of three or four mandibular teeth (mandibles bidentate in the O. unicornis species­group) (Schuster 1958). The female of Odontophotopsis can be distinguished from females of other sphaeropthalmine genera by the following combination of characters: presence of plumose pubescence, absence of dorsal carina on the antennal scrobe, antennal flagellomere I being only slightly longer than the pedicel, absence of genal carina, presence of a scutellar scale connected to a transverse carina, first metasomal segment subsessile and slightly disciform, and presence of lateral carinae defining pygidium. These characters are thought to be of generic importance and were chosen after a survey of approximately ten other undescribed probable Odontophotopsis females. Because the female of only one of 59 species has been described, it is unclear which characters are autapomorphic, if any, for the females and it is anticipated that the generic description will need to be modified as more females are described. Several described female species currently placed in Sphaeropthalma (Photopsis) Blake but not associated with males may be Odontophotopsis species, such as S. (P.) arota (Cresson), S. (P.) ceres (Fox) and S. (P.) zenobia (Blake), as well as several others. However, these species do not completely match the above generic description. As such, we feel that we should attain a better understanding of the generic characters for Odontophotopsis females by studying females from definitive sex associations before placing described species into Odontophotopsis. In the key to the mutillids of the United States (Manley and Pitts 2002), the Odontophotopsis female will terminate at couplet 16 with a choice between Dilophotopsis Schuster and Sphaeropthalma (Photopsis). Dilophotopsis females are much larger in size, have a transverse carina on the antennal tubercle, have a dorsal carina abruptly terminating at a distinct denticle on the basal third of the mandible (Fig. 8), have a granulate pygidium, and exhibit differences in plumose pubescence and the shape of the first metasomal segment. Photopsis females that could be confused with Odontophotopsis, such as S. (P.) orestes (Fox) or S. (P.) marpesia (Blake) have a dorsal carina on the antennal scrobe, have a granulate or coarsely rugose pygidium, and lack a scutellar scale. This last character may not be a reliable generic character because it is known to vary within other genera, such as Dasymutilla Ashmead. Odontophotopsis (Odontophotopsis) succinea Viereck Odontophotopsis succinea Viereck, Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci., Phila., 54:741­743, male, 1902. Odontophotopsis annulatus Baker, Invertebrata Pacifica, 1:94­96, male, 1905. NEW SYNON­ YMY. Female. Head. Head brown orange, clothed with sparse erect white brachyplumose pubescence, also clothed with dense decumbent white plumose pubescence. Clypeus clothed with erect white brachyplumose pubescence. Eye width 0.44 mm, distance to occipital margin from posterior eye margin 0.26 mm. Eyes convergent ventrally. Malar space 0.7X maximum eye width. Pedicel length 0.10 mm (Fig. 1). Flagellomere I slightly longer than pedicel (Fig. 1). Flagellomere II slightly shorter than I, equal in length to pedicel (Fig. 1). Antenna concolorous with head. Antennal scrobe not carinate dorsally. Front with small confluent punctures. Mandible orange, red brown distally. Dorsomedial portion of head with inconspicuous transverse tumid region just anterior to occipital carina, only visible at certain angles. Mesosoma. Mesosoma and coxae brown orange, femora and tibiae dark brown. Mesosoma with erect orange brown brachyplumose pubescence. Metanotal area and propodeal dorsum also with decumbent orange white plumose pubescence, denser posteriorly. Propodeum with only erect white brachyplumose pubescence posteriorly. Legs with both erect white brachyplumose and decumbent white plumose pubescence. Anterolateral margins of pronotum angulate with vertical carina (Fig. 3). Transverse sinuate carina present anterior to scutellar scale, similar in size to scale. Scutellar scale broadly bidentate. Lateral area of pronotum sparsely punctate with decumbent white plumose pubescence. Mesopleura with posterior half punctate with erect white brachyplumose pubescence; anterior half sparsely punctate with decumbent white plumose pubescence. Propodeum laterally sparsely punctate with decumbent white plumose pubescence. Mesosomal dorsum punctures similar to head, closely spaced. Punctures of vertical portion of propodeum small and sparsely spaced, distance apart at least 2X ­width of puncture. Declivity of propodeum flattened medially. Metasoma. Brown orange. T1 with sparse long erect white brachyplumose and short plumose pubescence. T1 flattened medially with small widely spaced punctures, distance apart at least 2X width of puncture. Anterior margin of T2 with moderate punctures, distance between punctures equal to width of puncture. Surface of T2 with denser punctures, some confluent, and with erect orange brachyplumose pubescence. T2 felt line 0.36X length of T2. T2­T5 and S2­S5 with dense orange white plumose pubescence fringe that obscures following tergite, and with sparse erect orange white brachyplumose pubescence. S2 with median tumid region on anterior sixth, flattened medially. T6 finely longitudinally rugose. Length. 5.25 mm. Male Larva. Body. Ten pairs of spiracles, second thoracic pair minute. Spiracles small, spiracular atria unarmed, subatria elongate. Integument lacking setae, clothed densely in spinules separated by 0.5­1.0X their own length. Head: 1. 2 X as wide as high, height measured to apex of clypeus, unpigmented except for apical half of mandible. Side of head more convex than vertex. Parietal bands elongate, faintly pigmented. Antennal orbit below middle of head capsule, located on large, circular elevated area; each with three sensilla. Head with several scattered setae. Mandible more than 2.0X as long as wide at base, without setae, terminating in four teeth in same plane, basal tooth much smaller, two preapical teeth subequal in size, smaller than apical tooth, length of second tooth from apex ~0.5X length of apical tooth (Fig. 6). Labrum bilobed, each lobe with 14­15 sensilla, some bearing minute setae, apical median margin spinulose. Maxilla with several setae laterally, minutely spinulose mesally. Maxillary palpus much wider than long, with three apical sensilla. Galea smaller than palpus, similarly formed, each with two sensilla. Labium broad, with a few small apical setae. Labial palpus much broader than long, with 4 sensilla. Spinneret a transverse slit, widened medially. Length. 4­6 mm. Type Material Examined. Odontophotopsis succinea, Holotype male, CA, La Jolla, Aug., Cockerell, ANSP. Odontophotopsis annulata, Holotype male, CA, Claremont, CUIC. Material Examined. USA: CA: Davis, 1 female, 3 males X. 1964, rearing no.3102, F.D. Parker (BBSL, JPPC); Monterey Co., Big Sur, 1 male, 7.VII. 1938, M. Cazier (UMC); San Diego Co.: Jacumba, 1 male, 20.VII. 1949 (UMSP), D.J. and J.N. Kissell; Live Oak Springs, 1 male, 11.VII.1923 (UMSP); Mission Dam, 3 males, 21.VI (UMSP); Pine Valley, F.W. Kelsey: 1 male, 25.Vl­ 4.VII.1927, (UMC); 1 male, 18.VII.1927, 1 male, 20.VII.1927, 1 male, 19.VIII.1927, 1 male, 11.IX.1927, 1 male, 21.IX.1927, 1 male, 26.IX.1927, 1 male, 28.VIII.1927, (UMSP); 1 male, 19.VIII.1927, (UMC); San Diego, 5 males, C.E. Ricksecker (NMNH, UMSP); Vallecitos, 1 male, 27.IX. 1936 (UMSP); Santa Cruz Co.: Santa Rosa Mts., 1 male, 15.VI.1946, D.J. and J.N. Kissell (UMC). Host. Three males and one female reared from Oxybelus uniglumis

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicCell Adhesion Molecules Research→French-language works237,207→