MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6931521674 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5029990

Phronimella Claus 1871

2004· article· en· W6931521674 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGenusType speciesType (biology)CrustaceanMediterranean climatePlanktonMargin (machine learning)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Genus Phronimella Claus, 1871 Phronimella Claus, 1871: 149. Anchylonyx Streets, 1877: 130. Type species Phronima elongata Claus, 1862. Type material could not be found at the ZMB or ZMH and is considered lost. Diagnosis Body and pereopods extremely slender. Pereonites 1 & 2 partly fused dorsally, not much deeper than following ones. Maxilliped with extremely reduced inner lobe, almost obsolete. Gnathopods 1 & 2 simple. Pereopod 5 with elongate carpus, only slightly widened distally, forming slender, imperfect subchela with propodus; anterior margin of basis to carpus dentate. Uropod 2 absent, or rudimentary in female; sometimes rudimentary in males, but usually with exopod and reduced endopod in mature specimens. Monotypic. Remarks Phronimella makes ‘barrels’ from gelatinous plankton just like Phronima but the host species is not known (Laval 1980). Phronimella is relatively common in the tropical regions of the world’s oceans and in the Mediterranean Sea.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.099

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0290.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics→French-language works237,207→