MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6931527180 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6105384

Ypresiomymra Archibald, Cover et Moreau 2006

2015· article· en· W6931527180 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCover (algebra)Head (geology)GenusPetiole (insect anatomy)Dorsum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Genus Ypresiomyrma Archibald, Cover et Moreau,2006 Type species Ypresiomyrma orbiculata Archibald, Cover et Moreau, 2006, by original designation. Diagnosis. Gyne. Large ants (body length more than 15 mm). Waist consisting of 1 segment (petiole). Petiole lacking anterior peduncle; node conical, well developed; attached to 1st gastral segment without notable constriction, length, height subequal. Gaster normal in proportions, not notably slender as in Avitomyrmex Archibald, Cover et Moreau, 2006, without constriction between 1st and 2nd gastral (abdominal III and IV) segments. 1st gastral segment bell-shaped, 0.69–0.96 times as long as 2nd. Mandibles triangular, shorter than head capsule length. Eyes, where known, large, well developed, placed at or anterior to cephalic mid-length. Propodeal dorsum rounded in lateral view, without projections. Forewing with closed cells1+2r, 3r, rm and mcu. Species included. Ypresiomyrma rebekkae Rust, Andersen, 1999 from Ølst and Fur Formations (Denmark, Eocene, earliest Ypresian) [Rust, Andersen, 1999], Y. orbiculata Archibald, Cover et Moreau, 2006, and Y. bartletti Archibald, Cover et Moreau, 2006 from the McAbee locality [Archibald et al., 2006]; Kamloops Group, unnamed formation; Canada, Eocene, Ypresian and the species described below.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.063

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms→French-language works237,207→