Bibliographic record
Abstract
Indoquedius parallelicollis (Scheerpeltz, 1965) Figs 1D–E, 7B Quedius (Indoquedius) parallelicollis Scheerpeltz, 1965: 295. Quedius (Indoquedius) sanguinipennis Scheerpeltz, 1965: 296 syn. nov. Indoquedius bicoloris Smetana, 2014: 184 syn. nov. Indoquedius qiuae Yan et al. 2017: 108 (synonymized by Smetana 2017b). Diagnosis Among members of the Bipunctatus group, Indoquedius parallelicollis can be distinguished by the darkened femora and tibiae (at least outer face) on all legs, the overall pale antennae without any markedly darkened segments, and the moderately coarse and sparse punctation of the elytra. Sympatric Indoquedius bicornutus Zhao & Zhou, 2010 is very similar but can be distinguished by the pale tibiae, coarser and denser elytral punctation. Smetana (2017a) had stated that the elytra of I. parallelicollis (as I. bicoloris) were either entirely red or entirely dark but among the paratype specimens examined was one specimen with dark elytra and a faint basolateral red spot, similar to what can occur in I. bicornutus. The paratype of I. parallelicollis represents another transitional color pattern with less obvious pale areas of the elytra basally and posteriorly (Fig. 1D). The abdominal coloration is also slightly more variable than previously stated (Smetana 2017a), with the apices of tergites narrowly paler in some specimens, while they are broadly paler in I. bicornutus. Type material Holotype MYANMAR – Kachin State • ♂; “N.E. Burma, Kambaiti; 2000 m; 4/6.1934; Malaise [printed label] / HOLOTYPUS [red handwritten label] / TYPUS Quedius parallelicollis, O. Scheerpeltz [dark red-pink label] / Quedius (Indoquedius) parallelicollis nov. spec., det. Scheerpeltz 1944 [printed label] / 6664 E91 [printed blue label] / parallelicollis Scheerpeltz [large, printed, folded label] / NHRS-JLKB 000021050 ”; NHRS. Paratype MYANMAR – Kachin State • 1 ♀; “ N.E. Burma, Kambaiti; 2000 m; 4/6.1934; Malaise [printed label] / Schwedisch Indian-Burma Expedition 1934 [printed label] / ex. coll. Scheerpeltz [printed blue label] / ALLOTYPUS [red handwritten label] / TYPUS Quedius parallelicollis, O. Scheerpeltz [dark red-pink label] / parallelicollis [pink card]”; NHW.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".