MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931542243 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6092199

FIGURE 1. Kishenehna prima USNM 621304, holotype hind wing. A in Kishenehna prima, a new genus and species of darner dragonfly (Odonata, Aeshnidae, Gomphaeschninae) from the early middle Eocene Kishenehn Formation of Montana, USA

2022· other· en· W6931542243 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPhonocardiography and Auscultation Techniques
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityRoyal British Columbia Museum
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeOblique caseDecussationRADIUSGenus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

FIGURE 1. Kishenehna prima USNM 621304, holotype hind wing. A, composite photograph; B, drawing. CuA, cubitus anterior; CuP, cubitus posterior; Mspl, medial supplement, the intercalary vein between MA and MP; Rspl, radial supplement, the intercalary vein between IR2 and RP3-4; b, brace vein; o, oblique crossvein; n, nodus; a, arculus; MA, media anterior; MP, media posterior; RP1, posterior branch of the radius 1; RP2, posterior branch of the radius 2; RP3-4, posterior branch of the radius 3+4; IRP1, first radial intercalary vein; IRP2, second radial intercalary vein; RA, anterior branch of the radius; pt, pterostigma; MAb, vein portion forming the distal side of the triangle; hp, humeral plate; ap, axillary plate. Coloured cells: purple, radial planate between IRP2 and Rspl; light blue, medial planate between MA and Mspl; darker blue, triangle; green, subtriangle; red, anal loop; yellow, supratriangle; brown, cubito-anal space. Scale bar is 10 mm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.145

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0430.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicPhonocardiography and Auscultation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207