MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931552020 · doi:10.5284/1114009

Silkstone Farm, 1 Stone Close, Coal Aston, Derbyshire: Historic Building Record of Two Barns

2021· article· en· W6931552020 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueArchaeology Data Service · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBarnExtant taxonCoalRoofRange (aeronautics)Quarter (Canadian coin)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An historic building record was carried out on two barns prior to their conversion to residential use at Silkstone Farm, 1 Stone Close, Coal Aston, Derbyshire. They are located to the east of the seventeenth century Grade II listed farmhouse (List Entry No. 1370020) and comprise a south range (Barn 01) and an east range (Barn 02), both of which are Grade II listed (List Entry No. 1087775). They are of likely eighteenth century date, certainly extant by 1835 and were part of a larger U-plan farmstead that was reduced in size in the last quarter of the twentieth century. The southern barn is the later of the two and was originally a stable with a pigeon loft over, a rare arrangement but not unheard of in Derbyshire but well attested nationally when keeping pigeons became more widespread from the seventeenth century. The eastern barn was most likely a cowhouse with a hay loft above and later used as a stable. Both buildings were converted to house pigs, probably during the twentieth century. The roof of the southern barn has been largely replaced, with the exception of the tiebeam that has a prominent ritual burn mark present, a feature found in other Georgian farm buildings in Derbyshire. The roof of the eastern range comprises re-used timbers, including one which is certainly from a cruck truss. The barn may have been remodelled with the original cruck frame timbers re-used.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.750
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchaeology Data ServiceSame topicMarine Bivalve and Aquaculture StudiesFrench-language works237,207