MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931555795 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6818936

Tamias ruficaudus

2016· article· en· W6931555795 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubspeciesRiparian zoneNest (protein structural motif)ChromosomeDorsum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

174. Red-tailed Chipmunk Tamias ruficaudus French: Tamia a queue rousse / German: Rotschwanz-Backenhérnchen / Spanish: Ardilla listada de cola roja Taxonomy. Eutamias ruficaudus A. H. Howell, 1920, “Upper St. Mary’s Lake, [Glacier County] Montana,” USA. Two subspecies are recognized. Subspecies and Distribution. T" r ruficaudus A. H. Howell, 1920 — SE British Columbia and extreme SW of Al- berta (Canada), NE Idaho and W Mon- tana (USA). T. r. simulans A. H. Howell, 1922 — SE Brit- ish Columbia (Canada), E Washington and N Idaho (USA). Descriptive notes. Head-body 121-8-127-2 mm, tail 98:3-109-1 mm; weight 57-1-67-3 g. The Red-tailed Chipmunk has an overall orangish dorsum, with five dark stripes that vary from black to brownish, offset by four light stripes that vary from gray to yellowish brown. Ventral pelage is white to cream, and ventral side oftail is reddish with black and pink borders. It can be distinguished from the Yellow-pine Chipmunk (1. amoenus) and the Least Chipmunk (7. minimus) by its larger size and byits characteristic reddish tail. Nominate ruficaudus has a longer baculum, and simulans has paler sides and ventral side of tail. Chromosome number of the Red-tailed Chipmunk is 2n = 38. Karyotype is type B for Tamias and consists offive pairs of metacentric autosomes, six pairs of submetacentric autosomes, seven pairs of acrocentric autosomes, a submetacentric X chromosome, and an acrocentric Y chromosome. Habitat. Ponderosa pine (Pinus ponderosa; Pinaceae) forests, mesic riparian stands, and subalpine stands, at elevations of ¢.720-2400 m. The Red-tailed Chipmunk is usually associated with thick vegetation or ground cover, such as woody debris and snags. Food and Feeding. Diet of the Red-tailed Chipmunk consists of a large variety of seeds and fruits and varies according to habitat occupied. It is known to scatterhoard food, but appears to act mostly as a larderhoarder. Breeding. Breeding season occurs from late April to mid-May in lower elevations, and from early to late May at higher elevations. Females produce one litter per year, and each year 50-73% of the females reproduce. Females in lower elevations have higher probability of successful reproduction and tend to produce larger litters, as do older females (older than 16 months). Only 18-29% of yearling females reproduce. Average litter size is 2:5-5-2 young, which are born after gestation of c.31 days. Young emerge from nest at 39-45 days,in earlyJuly in lower elevations and in late July in higher areas. Activity patterns. The Red-tailed Chipmunk is terrestrial and diurnal, but active above ground only between April and October. Nest is constructed from grass and lichens within burrows located under rocks, logs, or stumps. Some nests have been found in trees or shrubs. Movements, Home range and Social organization. There is no information available for this species. Status and Conservation. Classified as Least Concern on The IUCN Red List. The current population trend is stable. The Red-tailed Chipmunk is at potential risk in Alberta and British Columbia (Canada), due to the small amount of suitable habitat at that latitude, and lack of knowledge aboutits biology. Because it is restricted to a small geographic area, large scale environmental changes within this area could have an impact. Bibliography. Bennett (1999b), Best (1993d), Good & Sullivan (2001), Good, Demboski et al. (2003), Good, Hird et al. (2008), Hird & Sullivan (2009), Linzey & NatureServe (Hammerson) (2008aa), Nagorsen et al. (1999), Patterson & Heaney (1987), Pearson et al. (2003), Thorington et al. (2012).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.083

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0220.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsFrench-language works237,207