Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neoitamus orphne (Walker) Asilus orphne Walker, 1849: p. 456. Recognition characters: Black species; length 12–19 mm; mystax golden (bright yellow) to pale yellow; thorax black, thinly clothed with gray dust, setae laterally gray, dorsally mostly black; scutellar bristles 4 or more on the margin; wings hyaline, faintly gray at the extreme apex and along the narrow posterior border; abdomen black, narrow margin of each segment above gray, clothed with gray setae that are most abundant towards the base; femora shining black, fore femora yellow at apex, tibiae and metatarsis yellow, black at apex, other tarsal segments largely black. Distribution: Recorded from Wyoming by Geller-Grimm (2018). Habitat: Habitat not identified in Wyoming. In Virginia Neoitamus orphne is found on the edge of woodlands (Bedell 2010). Near the Ontario-Manitoba, Canada border, N. orphne is found in forests or the forest-grassland interface (Cannings 2014). Skevington (1999) reported one specimen in the Port Frank Forested Dunes in Ontario, Canada. Ethology: Nothing known. Prey: None known.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".