MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931566343 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4385683

Liogenys xanthocera Harold 1869

2020· article· en· W6931566343 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen MIND · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
Canadian institutionsCanadian Museum of Nature
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSynonym (taxonomy)Taxonomy (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Liogenys xanthocera Harold, 1869 Figs. 10, 13F, 14 Liogenys pallidicornis Blanchard, 1851: 168; Lacordaire 1855: 269 (generic redescription); Frey 1969: 42 (key). Liogenys xanthocerus Harold 1869a: 123 (new replacement name for L. pallidicornis); Harold 1869b: 1140 (checklist, synonymy); Kolbe 1907: 5 (checklist); Bruch 1911: 200 (checklist); Dalla Torre 1913: 318 (checklist); Frey 1969: 42 (key; junior synonym of L. pallidicornis [sic]); Krajčík 2012: 145 (checklist); Cherman et al. 2017: 4 (generic history). Liogenys xanthoceris [sic]: Frey 1969: 57 (synonym of L. pallidicornis [sic]). Liogenys xanthocera: Blackwelder 1944: 227 (checklist); Evans 2003: 215 (checklist); Evans & Smith 2009: 183 (checklist). Type material. Male lectotype of Liogenys pallidicornis here designated (MNHN): [white handwritten] “6051 / 34”, [light green, typeset and handwritten] “Patagonie / d’Orbigny / MUSÉUM PARIS ”, [green handwritten] “ L. pallidicornis. / Cat. Mus. / Baie de San Blas (Patagonie) / M. D’Orbigny”, [white typeset] “Southern Neotropical Scarabs / database # AS 2615155 / Liogenys xanthocera / Harold 1869 ♂ / DET:A.B.T.SMITH 2008”, [red, outlined, typeset and handwritten] “ LIOGENYS / PALLIDICORNIS / BLANCHARD, 1851 / LECTOTYPE / Des. Cherman M. A.”. Male paralectotype (MNHN) bearing the labels: [white handwritten] “6051 / 34”, [white handwritten] “1052”, [light green typeset and handwritten] “Patagonie / d’Orbigny / MUSÉUM PARIS ”, [white typeset] “Southern Neotropical Scarabs / database # AS 2615156 / Liogenys xanthocera / Harold 1869 ♂ / DET: A.B.T.SMITH 2008”, [red, outlined, typeset and handwritten] “ LIOGENYS / PALLIDICORNIS / ♂ / BLANCHARD, 1851 / PARALECTOTYPE / Des. Cherman M. A.” Non-type material (14). ARGENTINA. Patagonia: without locality, date, and collector, 1 female (ZMHB); Buenos Aires: Puán, Felipe Solá, XII.1944, A. Martínez, 2 males (CMNC); Puán, Felipe Solá, II.1946, A. Martínez, 4 males (CMNC); Puán, Felipe Solá, A. Martínez, XII.1951, 3 males (MZSP); Puán, Felipe Solá, XI.1959, A. Martínez, 1 male (MZSP); Puán, Felipe Solá, XII.1960, A. Martínez, 2 males (MZSP); Estancia Barraú, 30 km SW Villa Iris, XI.1946, A. Martínez, 1 male (CMNC). Diagnosis. Body elongate; body, head, and pronotum in general dark purple; elytra glabrous, shiny yellow, sides subparallel (Fig. 10A); clypeal emargination deep, narrow and rounded; clypeal lateral margin convex and produced, obtuse angle between outer side of anterior teeth and clypeal lateral projection (Fig. 10C); antenna with 10 antennomeres, yellow, club nearly twice as long as the funicle; posterior corners subangulate, obtuse; mesotibia cylindrical in cross section (Fig. 10D); pygidium slightly convex; wide, subtrapezoidal; pygidial disc glabrous or with unconspicous bristles throughout (Fig. 10E); males with inner margin of metatibia not carinate; transverse carina weakly defined; protarsomere II elongate; parameres narrowed at the midline; splitted after the midline; inner margins straight; apex spatulate (Fig. 10F). Redescription. Length: 7.3–7.6 mm; width: 3.8–3.9 mm. Dark purple in body, head, and pronotum, elytra dull yellow. Head. distance between eyes more than three times the width of one eye; clypeal emargination deep, narrow, and rounded; outer sides of anterior teeth parallel; clypeal lateral margin convex and produced, forming a rounded projection; distance between clypeal lateral projection and anterior tooth longer than the basal width of anterior tooth, distance between clypeal lateral projection and anterior margin of eye longer than one eye; obtuse angle between outer side of anterior teeth and clypeal lateral projection; antenna with 10 antennomeres, club nearly twice as long as and lighter in color than funicle. Thorax: anterior margin of pronotum straight; pronotal disc with punctures coarse, shallow and sparse; posterior corners subangulate, obtuse; hypomere, mesepisternum, sides of metaventrite, and metacoxae with sparse, long bristles; distance between mesocoxae and metacoxae less than twice the metacoxa width; scutellum ogival to rounded, punctate throughout. Elytra: shiny, glabrous; elytral suture and elytron unicolored, elevated; two inner pair of elytral ridges more defined than the other two ridges. Legs: procoxa with bristles; protibia with three teeth, middle and apical teeth equal in size, all three teeth equally spaced; mesotibia cylindrical in cross section, mesotibia dorsally smooth with two transverse carinae, the apical carina complete; inner margin of male metatibia not carinate; surface finely sculptured; metatibia with one transverse carina present posteriorly and weakly defined dorsally; metatibial apical spurs of equal lengths, equal to the diameter of the tibial apex; metatarsomere I shorter than metatarsomere II; in males protarsomeres and mesotarsomeres I–IV enlarged, protarsomere II long; protarsomeres and mesotarsomeres equally enlarged; claw bifid, symmetrical, superior tooth of claw almost three times longer and narrower than the inferior tooth; distance between teeth longer than the length of inferior tooth. Abdomen: ventrites with sparse bristles; propygidium glabrous; pygidium slightly convex; subtrapezoidal; pygidial width not exceeding distance between spiracles of propygidium; pygidial disc with inconspicuous bristles, finely and very sparsely punctate; pygidial apex subquadrate. Parameres: basal region wider than both sections of the parameres at its maximum width, parameres narrowed at the midline; parameral split after the midline; inner margins straight; apex spatulate, angulate; parameres straight or slightly convex in lateral view (Fig. 10G). Type locality. ARGENTINA. Baie de San-Blas (Patagonie) [Buenos Aires, Bahia de San Blas, 40°33’8’’S 62°14’4’’W]. Geographical distribution. ARGENTINA (Buenos Aires). Remarks. Liogenys xanthocera is easily recognized among the other Liogenys by its characteristic dark body, pronotum, and scutellum contrasting with the elytra dull yellow; and by the club nearly twice the length of the funicle. The teeth of the galea are reduced (Fig. 13F), as in L. sinuaticeps Moser (Cherman et al. 2016, 2017). The specimen from 30 km SW Villa Iris, Puán, Buenos Aires [38°21’15.8’’S 63°20’37.4’’W] shows variations in the body color, entirely dull yellow, the lateral margin of clypeus more produced, and the parameres strongly convex. As we have only this specimen with these single features, we presume that those differences are only intraspecific variations, needing further material to determine if it is a different species. The lectotype (Fig. 10B) was collected Bahía San Blas, Buenos Aires, Argentina during the period from 14 January–18 February 1829 by A.D. d’Orbigny. The region around the nearby village of “Patagones” (now known as Viedma, Río Negro) was collectively called Patagonia (Patagonie) at the time (see Smith 2017). The “1052” code number on the paralectotype corresponds with an entry in the original field notes of d’Orbigny (available from the MNHN library). D’Orbigny made these observations (text transcribed and translated): “we found this species in great numbers in January and February. They emerged from the earth every day, in numbers. We never saw them during the day, when they were hiding underground”. Blanchard (1851) described two species in Liogenys with the epithet “ pallidicornis ”, the first one in page 167 and the other in the next page. Harold (1869) corrected this homonym by replacing the name of the second one described, as L. xanthocera. The first one described, Liogenys pallidicornis Blanchard, 1851 is a valid name (Cherman et al. 2017).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.171
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.066 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen MINDSame topicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomyFrench-language works237,207