Scatopsciara (Scatopsciara) nigrita Hardy 1956
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Scatopsciara (Scatopsciara) nigrita Hardy, 1956 (Fig. 21 A – C) Scatopsciara (Uddmaniella) nigrita Hardy, 1956 [Hardy (1956): 86 – 89, fig. 11 a – d]. Literature: Hardy (1960): 231 – 232, fig. 78 a – d. Material studied: Holotype: Male, 14.iii.1953, Hawai‘i, O‘ahu, Palolo Valley, reared from rotting Plumeria, leg. C.P. Hoyt [BPBM, No. 2488 in the literature (on slide 2388 and 2488)]. Further material: 2 males, 28.xii.2000, Hawai‘i, Maui, Hana, rain forest, caught by net, leg. W. Mohrig (PWMP). Conservation status. E mbedded in Canada balsam. Head, palpus, antennae and wings isolated with wings under a separate cover slip. All morphological structures are in good condition. Comments. The species is characterized by a short 3-segmented palpus with a large basal segment, fore tibia with a small comb-like row of bristles, a short R 1, hypopygium with a bare intergonocoxal space and short and sparse hairs on the inner ventral margin of the gonocoxites; gonostylus small, pointed to the apex, with a short apical tooth and 4 long subapical spines; a wide and flat tegmen, and short aedeagus. Distribution. Hawaiian Islands (O‘ahu, Maui).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".