Micropygomyia (Coquillettimyia) vexator
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Micropygomyia (Coquillettimyia) vexator (Coquillett, 1907) vexator Coquillett, 1907: 102 (as Flebotomus). Type locality: United States of America, Maryland, Montgomery County, Plummer’s Island. Phlebotomus vexator Coquillett: Shannon (1926, taxonomy), Dyar (1929, taxonomy), Theodor (1933, taxonomy), Hall (1936, Louisiana record), Dampf (1938, mentioned), Mangabeira & Galindo (1944, redescription, California records), Rozeboom (1944, listed), Addis (1945b, keys), Packchanian (1946, Virginia record), Barretto (1947, catalogue), Dampf (1947c, taxonomy, Sonora record), Thurman et al. (1949, listed), Vargas & Díaz-Nájera (1953b, distribution), Quate (1955, keys, references), Ortiz & Álvarez (1963, listed), Eads et al. (1965, listed), Roberts (1965, Mississippi record), Ortiz,1965b (listed), Quate (1965, Nearctic catalogue), Downes (1972, Ontario record), Fairchild & Harwood (1961, Washington records, keys), Harwood (1965, Washington and Canada records). Phlebotomus (Brumptomyia) vexator Coquillett: Fairchild (1955, species group Brumpti, series vexator, listed). Syn. Phlebotomus vexator occidentalis Fairchild & Hertig, 1957: 334. Type locality: United States of America, California, Modoc County, Alturas trap station; Mono County, Topaz Lake. Young & Perkins (1984, subspecies not recognized). Lutzomyia vexator or vexatrix (Coquillett): Barretto (1962, listed), Theodor (1965, as species group Vexatrix), Rosabal & Miller (1970, keys, Louisiana record), Young (1972, Florida and Texas records), Chaniotis (1974, Montana record), Aitken et al. (1977, Connecticut record), Eads (1978, references), Steyskal (1979, appropriate name), Williams (1999, listed as species group Vexator, distribution). Lutzomyia (Lutzomyia) vexatrix (Coquillett): Forattini (1971, 1973, taxonomy). Lutzomyia (Helcocyrtomyia) vexator (Coquillett): Martins et al. (1978, listed, distribution), Young & Perkins (1984, taxonomy, distribution), Young & Duncan (1994, taxonomy, distribution), Ibáñez-Bernal (2000 a, 2003, taxonomy, distribution), Ibáñez-Bernal (2005a, 2005b, keys). Micropygomyia (Coquillettimyia) vexator (Coquillett): Galati (2003, classification, listed), Shimabukuro et al. (2017, list, distribution), Galati (2018, listed, keyed), Galati (2021, classification, keys). General distributio n. Canada, United States of America, Mexico (Shimabukuro et al. 2017; Galati 2018, 2021). Distribution in Mexico. Sonora (Dampf 1944; Vargas & Díaz-Nájera 1953b).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".