Leptocera angulispina Buck & Marshall 2009, new species
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Leptocera angulispina Buck, new species (Figs. 148–154, 199) Leptocera finalis auctt., nec (Collin, 1956): Marshall, 1997 (in part). Description. On average slightly darker and smaller than related species. Enlarged acrostichals short and not very conspicuous, only about half as long as lower orbital bristle; prescutellar acrostichals not enlarged. Mid tibia with bristles relatively short: bristle above distal dorsal shorter than anteroapical bristles; posteroapical bristles of same length, extending barely to socket of ventrobasal metatarsal bristle. Male terminalia (Figs. 148–151): Sternite 5 with posteromedial desclerotized area somewhat small. Anterior section of surstylus with anterior process in lateral view more or less rectangular and relatively short; bare lateral ridge at apex of anterior process prominent and darkened (best seen in ventral view); ventral lobe rounded, not very prominent, with short bristles that are separated by a noticeable gap from the long, basal, posterior bristle. Posterior section of surstylus with few bristles on dorsal (posterior) surface and unequal apical bristles. Postgonite as in Fig. 199. Female terminalia (Figs. 152–154): Hind margin of sternite 7 produced medially. Sternite 8 with lateral margins slightly sinuate, posterolateral lobes relatively short, median process wide. Spermathecae subcylindrical, with scattered spicules, shallow apical invagination and similar basolateral depression (in paired spermathecae on side facing other spermatheca); surface weakly striate. Type material. Holotype ♂ (DEBU): U.S.A., Alaska, Richardson Hwy mi 206, 19.vi.1987, beaver pond, sweep, S.A. Marshall. Paratypes (all DEBU): 2 ♀♀, same data as holotype; 1 ♂, same but from debris on beaver run, 1 ♂, 2 ♀♀, same but from beaver pond mammal runs; 2 ♀♀, same but from debris nr. beaver pond; 2 ♀♀, same but from beaver dam. U.S.A. Alaska: 3 ♂♂, 1 ♀, Glenn Hwy 25 mi N Gakona, 18.vi.1987, alder/wet moss, S.A. Marshall. CANADA. Yukon Territory: 2 ♂♂, 2 ♀♀, Dempster Hwy, Tombstone Mts, 3.vii.1985, river gravel, flood debris, S.A. Marshall; same as previous but 4.vii.1985, flood debris nr. ice; 1 ♀, Dempster Hwy, Tombstone Mtn Camp, 6–12.vii.1985, mushroom trap in Sphagnum /lichen, S.A. Marshall; 1 ♂, Dawson City, Klondike Hwy km 45, 9–12.vii.1985, hydro cut, FIT in willow/ Equisetum, S.A. Marshall. Other material examined. CANADA. Yukon Territory: 1 ♀, Klondike Hwy km 300, 23.vi–14.vii.1987, willow/spruce, carrion trap, S.A. Marshall (DEBU); 1 ♀, Erebia Creek, base camp, 67°58’N 136°29’W, 10.vii.1987, carrion trap by creek, S.A. Marshall (DEBU). Etymology. The species name is a noun in apposition and refers to the angulate anterior process of the anterior section of the surstylus and the similarity to the eastern Palaearctic L. equispina. Distribution (Map 8). Restricted to the Yukon Territory (Canada) and Alaska (U.S.A.). One locality is located within a kilometre from the border with the Northwest Territories so the species should be expected there as well. Discussion. Leptocera angulispina sp.n. is very similar to L. tenuispina sp.n. from British Columbia, L. equispina from the eastern Palaearctic, and to a lesser degree to the trans-Nearctic L. kanata sp.n. It differs from all these species by the less prominent ventral lobe of the anterior surstylar section, the more basally (dorsally) positioned long posterior bristle of the latter, and the shorter, angulate anterior process of the anterior surstylar section. Males of L. kanata sp.n. furthermore possess stronger bristles on the ventral lobe of the anterior surstylar section. Females of L. angulispina sp.n. differ from all mentioned species by the slightly sinuate (not angulate) lateral margins of sternite 8, and the shorter posterolateral lobes of the latter.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".