MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931605237 · doi:10.5683/sp3/vi2j14

Entrepreneurship Among Afro-Descendant Communities: Practices, Motivations, and Support Strategies | L'Entreprenneuriat au sein des communautés afrodescendantes: pratiques, motivations et strategies d'accompagnement

2025· dataset· en· W6931605237 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueBorealis · 2025
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInsurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEntrepreneurshipFace (sociological concept)Order (exchange)PortraitEthnic group

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Executive Summary Based on the specific case of entrepreneurs from black communities, the aim of the project is to identify effective strategies for supporting entrepreneurs from ethnic minorities. This will be achieved through a fact-based approach and the empirical study needed to develop appropriate public policies, in the face of a challenge that is both economic and social. Specifically, the project aims to : a) Draw up a portrait of businesses owned or run by owners from black communities, b) Analyze the obstacles and challenges faced by these entrepreneurs, c) Identify shortcomings and best practices in business practice d) Conduct a retrospective and in-depth analysis of the situations of various entrepreneurs, based on their personal experiences, and above all, e) Evaluate support and accompaniment strategies in light of the specificities of this ecosystem, in order to determine effective combinations Résumé Exécutif En s’appuyant sur le cas spécifique des entrepreneurs issus des communautés noires, le but du projet est d’identifier des stratégies efficaces pour soutenir les entrepreneurs issus des minorités ethniques. Ceci à travers une approche factuelle et une étude empirique nécessaire pour élaborer des politiques publiques adaptées, face à un enjeu à la fois économique et social. De façon spécifique, le projet se donne pour ambition de : a) Dresser un portrait des entreprises détenues ou dirigées par des propriétaires issus des communautés noires, b) Analyser les obstacles et défis que rencontrent ces entrepreneurs, c) Identifier leurs lacunes et bonnes pratiques usitées dans la pratique des affaires d) Analyser de façon rétrospective et approfondie les situations de différents entrepreneurs à partir du récit de leur vécu, et surtout, e) Évaluer les stratégies de soutien et d’accompagnement au regard des spécificités de cet écosystème, afin d’en déterminer les combinaisons efficaces.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.029

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBorealisSame topicInsurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk ManagementFrench-language works237,207