Diploneis latiuscula Jovanovska & Wilson & Hamilton & Stone 2023, sp. nov.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diploneis latiuscula sp. nov. (LM Figs 85–96, SEM Figs 97–107) Valves are weakly asymmetric, broadly lanceolate to rhombic-elliptic with convex margins and bluntly round apices (Figs 85–97). Valve length is 34.5–47 μm and valve width is 19.5–26.5 μm. The axial area is narrow, lanceolate, slightly expanding into a small to indistinguishable and weakly asymmetric central area (Fig. 85), 4–5.3 μm wide. Externally, the longitudinal canal is lanceolate to linear, slightly expanded in the middle of the valve with three rows of cribrate areolae (>30 poroids) narrowing into one at the valve apices (Figs 85–98, 100). Internally, a thick non-porous slightly raised silica plate encloses the longitudinal canal (Figs 102, 105, 106). Externally, the raphe is filiform, curved; the proximal ends are within expanded teardrop depressions (Figs 97, 101). The distal raphe ends are unilaterally bent to the same side and terminate at the valve face mantle junction (Figs 97, 98). Internally, the raphe branches are slightly arched with simple proximal and distal ends that are slightly elevated in a depression formed by the longitudinal canal (Figs 102–104). The striae are parallel at mid-valve becoming radiate towards the valve apices, 9–10 in 10 μm. Striae are uniseriate becoming biseriate towards the valve margins (white arrow in Fig. 99). The striae are composed of large round to rectangular areolae covered externally with a fine pored cribra (>40 poroids), 13–15 in 10 μm. The inter-areolar thickenings have crested fin-like ridges, which are serrated into ca. 5–7 notched edges (Fig. 100). The areolae increase in size towards the valve margins (Figs 97, 100). Internally, the alveoli open via a single elongated opening covered with a thin silica layer (Fig. 107). The valvocopula has serrated advalvar edges (Figs 105, 106). Type:— UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA, Lake Tanganyika, Jakobsen Beach, at 783 m elevation; submerged roots, 1 m water depth, 4°54’33.4” S 29°35’54.5” E, E. Jovanovska, October 7 th 2019 (holotype designated here, circled specimen BM-108973! = Fig. 91, isotypes ANSP-GC17202!, CANA-129320!). Type material CANA-129320. Registration: http://phycobank.org/103722 Pictures of the isolated specimen:— LM micrograph on 1000× magnification (Fig. S3s). Sequence data:— Plastid gene rbc L sequence (GenBank accession: OQ 660276). Etymology:— The specific epithet ‘ latiuscula ’ refers to the broad width of the valves. Ecology and distribution:— Diploneis latiuscula sp. nov. has only been observed from the type material, the northern sub-basin of Lake Tanganyika from the Tanzanian side (see Fig. 1c, d). Since it was found on submerged roots, the community consisted mainly of epiphytic species with occasional occurrences of D. duplex sp. nov. Diploneis latiuscula sp. nov. is very rare in the type material and could therefore have been found in these roots as a result of water currents, upwelling or turbulence, considering its proximity to the sandy areas that are probably its natural living substrate. Main differential characters:— Valve shape, striae pattern, external like-fin ornamentations across the valve, and poroids>40 per areola. Similar species:— Diploneis tanganyikae sp. nov., D. cristata sp. nov., Diploneis tumida sp. nov., Diploneis lecohuiana Lange-Bertalot & Fuhrmann (2017: 26), and Diploneis ellipticasinensis Lange-Bertalot & Fuhrmann (2020: 42).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".