Oxneriaria supertegens S. Y. Kondr. & Lőkös Acta Bot. Hung.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Oxneriaria supertegens (Arnold) S.Y. Kondr. & Lőkös Acta Bot. Hung. 59 (3–4): 358. 2017. ≡ Aspicilia supertegens Arnold, Verh. K. K. Zool. - Bot. Ges. Wien 27: 567. 1877. ≡ Lecanora supertegens (Arnold) Zahlbr., Cat. Lich. Univ. 5: 354. 1928. (Fig. 1D) Thallus lichenized, crustose, thick, usually circular, smooth to irregularly cracked, creamy-white, yellowish-white to greyish-white, matt. Prothallus not visible. Apothecia immersed, 0.5–1.5 mm in diam., thalline margin concolorous with the thallus, thin to thick, disc rounded to irregular, black, flat and matt, sometimes with white pruina. Hymenium colourless, 120–150 μm tall, with submoniliform paraphyses (3–4 globose apical cells), epihymenium green-brown to olive-brown, N+ green intensifying, K+ yellowish brown (Caesiocinerea-green), hypothecium colourless. Asci 8- spored, ascospores hyaline, simple, ellipsoid, 18–24 × 8–15 μm. Conidia filiform, slightly curved, 14–25 × 1 μm. Chemistry: No secondary metabolites were detected in the analysed material. Ecology and distribution: Oxneriaria supertegens is a rare, circumpolar and arctic-alpine species (Thomson 1984), which has been reported from Austria, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden and Switzerland (Vitikainen et al. 1997; Llimona & Hladun 2001; Roux 2012; Wirth et al. 2013; Nimis et al. 2018; Westberg et al. 2021; Nimis & Martellos 2022) and from outside Europe from USA and Canada (Thomson 1984; Esslinger 2016). Here, it is reported for the first time from Poland. Three specimens of this species, stored in the KRAM herbarium, were collected in the Tatry Mts in 1987, but remained unidentified. Oxneriaria supertegens prefers specific, very moist habitats, especially siliceous boulders close to mountain brooks and rivers that are frequently sprinkled or periodically flooded with fresh water. Notes: The species most similar to O. supertegens is Aspicilia aquatica (Fr.) Körb. Both taxa occur in similar, humid habitats and have a whitish, smooth to slightly cracked thallus. The main differences between the species are the length of the conidia (shorter in A. aquatica, 12–15 cm) and the size of the ascospores (larger in A. aquatica, 22–27[–35] × 14–20 cm) (Wirth et al. 2013). Material examined: POLAND. Małopolskie province: Karpaty Mts, Tatry Zachodnie Mts, upper part of the Jarząbcza Valley, elev. 1360 m, on granite boulders in the bed of the Jarząbczy stream, on surfaces protruding above the water surface, 10 October 1987, J. Nowak (KRAM L-34324); Tatry Zachodnie Mts, upper part of the Jarząbcza Valley, elev. 1310 m, on granite boulders in the bed of the Jarząbczy stream, flooded periodically with water, 10 October 1987, J. Nowak (KRAM L-34348, 34332). Selected specimens of Aspicilia aquatica examined. POLAND. Małopolskie province: Karpaty Mts, High Tatry Mts, Pańszczyca Valley, Czerwony Stawek pond, elev. ca. 1700 m, on granite rock in water, 8 July 1971, J. Nowak (KRAM L-19885); High Tatry Mts, Rysy Mt., elev. 2140 m, in water race, on siliceous rock, 8 Aug. 2003, A. Flakus s.n. (KRAM L-48329); High Tatry Mts, Rysy Mt., elev. 2160 m, 20 July 2004, A. Flakus 2724 (KRAM L).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.029 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".