MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931613558 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5672180

Hoplitis (Formicapis) robusta Nylander 1848

2016· article· en· W6931613558 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychedelics and Drug Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsType (biology)HolotypeTaxonomy (biology)NomenclatureType speciesParatype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hoplitis (Formicapis) robusta (Nylander 1848) Heriades robusta Nylander 1848: 270. Type material: Lectotype ♀, by designation of Tkalcu (1995), “Helsingfors” (Finland), Finnish Museum of Natural History, Helsinki. Type species of Formicapis Sladen. Osmia Rhinoceros Giraud 1861: 464. Type material: Syntypes ♀♀, “Gastein” (Austria), Giraud Collection. Synonymy in Schletterer (1889). Heriades trinacria Morawitz 1869: 41. Type material: Ƌ, “im Gdowschen Kreise” (Russia), Zoological Institute, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg. Synonymy in Popov (1946). Formicapis clypeata Sladen 1916: 271. Type material: Syntypes Ƌ♀, “Aweme, Manitoba and Waterhole, Alberta” (Canada). Synonymy in Peters (1970). New records. SWITZERLAND, Grisons: Vals, Riefa-Pradätsch-Riedboda, 1600–2050m, 25.7.2008 (leg. A. Müller); Medel, Uaul da Vergera, 1600m, 18.6.2013 (leg. R. Neumeyer); Sedrun, Uaul Bugnei, 1700m, 5.7.– 1.8.2013 (leg. A. Müller); St Gallen: Pfäfers, 1420m, 7.7.– 31.7.2013 (leg. H. Martz); Valais: Chandolin/Siders, 2200m, 18.7.1989 (leg. Perraudin); Visperterminen, 2000m, 12.8.2005 (leg. A. Müller); Montana, 15.7.2006 (leg. K. Hirt). AUSTRIA, Carinthia: Oberschachnern SE Heiligenblut, 22.8.1985 (leg. J. Gusenleitner); Ochsenriegel NW Weinebene, Koralpe, 1460m, 25.8.1989 (leg. J. Gusenleitner); Tirol: Zedlach W Matrei, 20.8.1985 (leg. J. Gusenleitner). ITALIA, South Tirol: Wolkenstein, 2.7.1921; Seiser Alp, 2.– 14.7.1971 (leg. H. Wolf); Schnals/ Kurzras, Meran, 2100m, 7.– 10.8.1974 (leg. H. Wolf); Pfossental, 1500–2000m, 27.8.1984 (leg. N. Mohr). MONGOLIA: Khangaur Mountains 5km N Khunt, 20.7.2005 (leg. J. Halada). Distribution. Boreal zone across Europe (southern half of Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Belarus, European part of Russia), Asia (Asian part of Russia, northern Mongolia, northeasternmost China) and North America (Alaska, Canada) (Grünwaldt 1939; Elfving 1968; Peters 1970; Romankova 1985; Tkalcu 1995; Prishchepchik 2000; Wu 2006; Ascher & Pickering 2015). In addition, H. robusta is distributed in the Alps (Italy, Switzerland, Austria) between 1200m and the timberline (Schwarz et al. 1996; Ebmer 1997, 2001; Amiet et al. 2004; Kopf 2008) and in mountainous regions of the western USA southwards to California and Colorado (Hurd & Michener 1955). According to Rasmont et al. (1985), H. robusta also occurs in Belgium and Luxembourg, which is certainly erroneous, as well as in France, which is not beyond doubt as no reliable record exists for this country (Benoist 1931; M. Aubert & G. LeGoff personal communication). Pollen hosts. Polylectic with a strong preference for Potentilla (Rosaceae), e.g. P. erecta (Tab. 1). Females collect pollen on flowers of P. erecta by rapidly seesawing their metasomal scopa against the anthers, which they embrace below the mesosoma, while turning their body axis around the flower centre (Fig. 2); simultaneously, they suck nectar from the nectaries at the base of the androecium. The importance of Potentilla as pollen source is apparent by the finding that its pollen constituted 68.1% of the total pollen grain volume and that 18 out of 22 pollen loads analyzed contained Potentilla pollen, 13 of which were pure loads (Tab. 1). Additional pollen sources were Helianthemum (Cistaceae), Medicago (Fabaceae), Rubus (Rosaceae), Cichorioideae (Asteraceae) and Ranunculus (Ranunculaceae). The fact that the two pollen loads originating from the USA were composed of pollen of the Potentilla type and of Helianthemum, respectively, suggests that North American and European populations of H. robusta exhibit similar host plant preferences. One brood cell provision from Wyoming analysed by Clement & Rust (1975), however, was composed of putative Fabaceae pollen, suggesting that flowers of Fabaceae might locally be important pollen hosts. Flower records: Taraxacum (Hurd and Michener 1955; Elfving 1968); Anthriscus sylvestris, Geranium palustre, G. sylvaticum, Geum rivale, Leontodon autumnalis, Potentilla anserina, Satureja alpina, Sedum acre, S. aizoon, S. camtschaticum, S. cepaea, S. spurium, Silene viscaria (Elfving 1968); Silene rupestris (Peters 1970); Lotus corniculatus, Potentilla aureola, P. pulcherrima (label records). Nesting biology. Nesting sites are insect burrows and drilled borings (diameter 4–5mm) in dead wood containing 3–14 linearly arranged brood cells (Clement & Rust 1975; Frey-Gessner 1880). Some nests contain empty vestibule cells following the last brood cell. Cell partitions are made of chewed leaves, sometimes with small pieces of wood embedded in the leaf matrix. The nest plug varies in thickness from 10mm to 14mm and consists of 8–13 layers of leaf pulp (Clement & Rust 1975). In one case, a female collected leaf pulp on leaves of Potentilla erecta (A. Müller unpublished).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.935
Threshold uncertainty score0.965

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0500.036

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicPsychedelics and Drug StudiesFrench-language works237,207