Diploneis lunata Jovanovska & Wilson & Hamilton & Stone 2023, sp. nov.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diploneis lunata sp. nov. (LM Figs 193–205, SEM Figs 206–213) Valves are weakly asymmetric, linear-elliptic with parallel to weakly convex margins and round apices (Figs 193–206). Valve length is 26.5–55 μm and valve width is 16–25 μm. The axial area is narrow, lanceolate, slightly expanding into a longitudinally elongate and weakly asymmetric central area (Figs 195, 206, 207), 2.8–4 μm wide. Externally, the canal is lanceolate, slightly expanded in the middle of the valve with three rows of large cribrate (ca. 10 poroids) areolae narrowing into two to one at the valve apices (Figs 193–208). Internally, a thick non-porous slightly raised silica plate encloses the longitudinal canal (Fig. 210). Externally, the raphe is filiform, curved with deflected teardrop proximal ends; the raphe ends are positioned within an elongated teardrop depression (Figs 206, 207). The distal raphe ends are unilaterally bent to the same side and terminate on the valve face (Figs 206, 208). Internally, the raphe is curved with simple proximal and distal ends that are slightly elevated in a depression formed by the longitudinal canal (Figs 210– 212). The striae are parallel at mid-valve changing to radiate towards the apices, 9–10 in 10 μm. Striae are uniseriate becoming biseriate towards the valve margins (Figs 206, 209). The striae are composed of round to rectangular areolae covered externally with cribra (15–25 poroids), 12–15 in 10 μm. The inter-areolar thickenings have transapical and longitudinal fin-like silica ridges serrated with ca. 5–8 notched edges. The canal ridges are slightly bent into a semi-circular shape. The areolae increase in size towards the valve margins (Figs 206, 208). Internally, the alveoli open via a single elongated opening covered with a thin silica layer (Fig. 213). Type:— UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA, Lake Tanganyika, Kiganza Bay near Gombe National Park, at 768 m elevation; sand, 12 m water depth, collected SCUBA diving, 4°47’44.9” S 29°35’57.6” E, A. Indermaur, 8 th July 2019 (holotype designated here, circled specimen BM-108988! = Fig. 197, isotypes ANSP-GC17217!, CANA-129319!). Type material CANA-129319. Registration: http://phycobank.org/103713 Pictures of the isolated specimen:— LM micrograph on 1000× magnification (Fig. S2i). Sequence data:— Plastid gene rbc L sequence (GenBank accession: OQ 660292). Etymology:— The specific epithet ‘ lunata ’ refers to the crescent-shaped fin-like silica ridges in the canal region of the valve face. Ecology and distribution:— This species has only been observed along the Tanzanian coast of Lake Tanganyika. It is a very rare species in a few very narrow areas in the central and northern basins of the lake, mainly in Kiganza Bay and less so in Kalya Bay, Mahale National Park, and the Rukoma area (Fig. 1c–e). In the alkaline, moderately mineral-rich and highly transparent waters, it was found on the sandy stretches between 12 and 33 m water depth, but also on submerged rocks at Jakobsen Beach, where it was probably brought by water currents or turbidity. Diploneis lunata sp. nov. usually occurs together with D. kilhamiana sp. nov., D. cocquytiana sp. nov., D. tanganyikae sp. nov., and D. serrulata sp. nov. Main differential characters:— Valve shape, striae pattern, striae density, external fin-like ornamentations across the valve, broad virgae, and poroids 15–25 per areola. Similar species:— Diploneis fossa sp. nov., Diploneis parahinziae Lange-Bertalot, Fuhrmann & Ringel (in Lange-Bertalot & Fuhrmann 2016: 168), and Diploneis heisingeriae Jurilj (1954: 127).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".