MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931639888 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7875117

Diploneis gigantea Jovanovska & Wilson & Hamilton & Stone 2023, sp. nov.

2023· article· en· W6931639888 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsCanadian Museum of Nature
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRapheRidgeApex (geometry)Cusp (singularity)Margin (machine learning)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Diploneis gigantea sp. nov. (LM Figs 73–78, SEM Figs 79–84) Valves are weakly asymmetric, linear-elliptic with slightly convex margins and round ends (Figs 73–79). Valve length is 67–106.5 μm and valve width is 37.5–46 μm. The axial area is narrow, expanding towards the narrow, lanceolate and weakly asymmetric central area (Figs 73, 80), 6–8 μm wide. Externally, the longitudinal canal is broad, lanceolate to linear, slightly expanded in the middle of the valve with four rows of cribrate areolae (10–15 poroids) narrowing into one at the valve apices (Figs 73–78, 80, 81). Internally, a thick non-porous slightly raised silica plate encloses the longitudinal canal (Fig. 83). Externally, the raphe is filiform, curved with proximal ends positioned within expanded teardrop depressions (Figs 79, 80). The distal raphe ends are unilaterally bent to the same side as the proximal ends and terminate at the valve face margin (Figs 79, 81). Internally, the raphe is curved with simple proximal and distal ends that are slightly elevated in a deep depression formed by the longitudinal canal (Figs 82, 83, 84). The striae are parallel at mid-valve becoming radiate towards the valve apices, 7–8 in 10 μm. Striae are uniseriate throughout (Figs 79, 81). The striae are composed of small round to rectangular areolae covered with cribra (>30 poroids), 7–8 in 10 μm. Each areola opens in a depression slightly lower than the non-porous valve surface. The inter-areolar thickenings have crested fin-like ridge silica ornamentations, which are serrated into ca. 3–5 notched edges (in the illustrated specimens hardly visible but see white arrow in Fig. 81). The stria areolae are divided by thickenings, forming from the areolae wall (white arrow in Fig. 81). Areolae increase in size towards the valve margins (Fig. 81). Internally, the alveoli open via a single elongated opening covered with a thin silica layer (Fig. 82). Type:— REPUBLIC OF ZAMBIA, Lake Tanganyika, Kalambo Falls Lodge, at 771 m elevation; mud, 18 m water depth, collected SCUBA diving, 8°37’25.6” S 31°11’59.7” E, H. Buescher, 1 th September 2018 (holotype designated here, circled specimen BM-108994! = Fig. 75, isotypes ANSP-GC17223!, CANA-129338!). Type material CANA-129315. Registration: http://phycobank.org/103709 Pictures of the isolated specimen:— LM micrograph on 1000× magnification (Fig. S2a). Sequence data:— Plastid gene rbc L sequence (GenBank accession: OQ660290). The sequence comes from an isolated individual from the same area, but on sand in 5 m water depth (Acc. No. 91, Diatom Collection Elena Jovanovska; see coordinates in Table S1). However, as this species is extremely rare, we chose a nearby, deeper site as type material, where the species is more abundant but still very rare. Etymology:— The specific epithet ‘ gigantea ’ refers to the very large cell sizes of this species. Ecology and distribution:— This species has only been observed on the coasts of Tanzania and Zambia in the southern and central sub-basins of Lake Tanganyika. In the alkaline, moderately mineral-rich and highly transparent waters, the species usually inhabits sandy and muddy substrates (sometimes with mollusk shells) between 9 and 26 m water depth. It can also be found on submerged rocks below 20 m water depth and below 9 m water depth, where it is very rare. Diploneis gigantea sp. nov. was found mainly in the southern sub-basin at Kalambo Falls Lodge, Isanga Bay, Mutondwe Island, Cape Nangu at Kasaba Bay, Ndole Bay (Fig. 1c, f) and less frequently in the central sub-basin in Kalya Bay and Mahale National Park (Fig. 1c, e). In all these locations the species is extremely rare, typically one to two (very rarely a handful) specimens are found per slide together with D. salzburgeri sp. nov., D. cocquytiana sp. nov., D. elongata sp. nov., D. tessellata sp. nov., D. fossa sp. nov., and D. cristata sp. nov. Main differential characters:— Large valve size, linear-elliptic valve shape, striae density, and external fin-like ornamentations across the valve. Similar species:— Diploneis fossa sp. nov., Diploneis goohon Kulikovskiy & Lange-Bertalot (2015: 95), and Diploneis obtusa Kulikovskiy & Lange-Bertalot (2015: 99).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicPlant Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207