FIG. 6 in Biostratigraphy and taxonomy of polymerid trilobites of the Manuels River Formation (Drumian, middle Cambrian), Newfoundland, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
FIG. 6. — Jincella? applanata (Hicks in Salter & Hicks, 1869); A, B, internal cast and mould of the same specimen, glabellar furrows and ornamentation on internal cast preserved (NFM F-3398 from 8.94 m); C, internal cast of a cranidium attached to the thorax, ornamentation and occipital node preserved (NFM F-3401 from 8.94 m); D, internal cast of a cranidium with one librigena attached, venulose markings on librigena and cranidium anterior of eye ridges preserved (NFM F-3595 from 15.30 m); E, internal cast of a trapezoidal shaped cranidium, occipital ring and venulose markings anterior of eye ridges preserved, NFM F-3594 from 15.30 m; F, internal cast of trapezoidal shaped cranidium, densely packed scattered granuels preserved, fixigenae slightly separated (NFM F-2949 from 6.15 m); G, internal cast of a round shaped cranidium, some granuels have dents preserved, fixigenae slightly separated (NFM F-3297 from 6.18 m); H, internal cast of a round shaped cranidium, occipital ring and ornamentation preserved (NFM F-3616 from 9.33 m); I, mould of a round shaped cranidium, occipital node and ornamentation preserved (NFM F-3405 from 8.94 m). Scale bars: 1 mm.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".