MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931661322 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.801458

SuperDARN Radar Software Toolkit (RST) 5.1.1

2025· other· en· W6931661322 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typeother
Languageen
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadarSoftwareKey (lock)Radar systemsRadar tracker3D radar

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Key updates in version 5.1 of the Radar Software Toolkit (RST) include: New/Updated Radar Information Corrected radar names for Siziwang radars (sze, szw) Added Hokkaido East (hok) tdiff value after data analysis Updated Hankasalmi (han) info for Borealis installation Updated SANAE (san) info for Mabel installation Updated Iceland East, West (ice, icw) info after electronics upgrades. Documentation, Bug fixes and Miscellaneous Following discussions around the 2025 SuperDARN Workshop and following Data Analysis Working Group meetings, the author list has been updated to include all known previous authors

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: Software
Teacher disagreement score0.203
Threshold uncertainty score0.678

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2030.228

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)French-language works237,207