MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931661593 · doi:10.5284/1091545

Avro Shed, Woodford Aerodrome, Chester Road, Stockport, Greater Manchester: Historic Building Record

2014· article· en· W6931661593 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueArchaeology Data Service · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicConstruction Engineering and Safety
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRoofSteel frameQuarter (Canadian coin)TrussStormVolcano

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The site consists of a small single storey aeroplane hangar at the southern end of the airstrip at Woodford Aerodrome, Woodford, near Stockport, Greater Manchester, known as the Avro Shed due to 'A.V. Roe and Co Ltd' being painted across the principal elevation. It was recorded to a Level 3, as defined by English Heritage, following storm damage and in mitigation of it's removal from the site ahead of development. The shed was believed to be one of the earliest buildings on the site following the formation of Woodford Aerodrome in 1924. It was on a north-west to south-east axis, constructed of a steel clad frame in corrugated iron, and two and a quarter bays wide, consisting of two barrel vaulted roofs divided by a central ridged roof section. The trusses supporting the barrel vaulted roof spans were a hybrid of scissor- bow-strung trusses. The date of it's original construction is thought to be either 1916, having been moved from Avro's previous location on Alexandra Aerodrome, Manchester, or c. 1930 and built specifically for Avro. It does not appear tp conform to any apparent standard type of airfield building construction, and there are no known similar buildings of this design in Britain, although there are similar, but much larger, sheds from the First and Second World War airfields in the United States. Consequently, it is custom-built for Avro (possibly in 1927)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.753
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchaeology Data ServiceSame topicConstruction Engineering and SafetyFrench-language works237,207