MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6931667931 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5119113

Metaclisa (Trichometaclisa) ottoi Nabozhenko & Mckellar & Bukejs 2021, sp. nov.

2021· article· en· W6931667931 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicMeta-analysis and systematic reviews
Canadian institutionsRoyal Saskatchewan MuseumUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDorsumHead (geology)Fibrous jointWingOblique case

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Metaclisa (Trichometaclisa) ottoi sp. nov. (Figs. 1–2) Material. Holotype: collection number P3300.143 [RSKM]; adult, sex unknown. The complete beetle with partially exposed metathoracic wings is included in a transparent, yellow amber piece with approximate dimensions of 51 mm × 15 mm and a maximum thickness of 8 mm; preserved without supplementary fixation. Organic syninclusions: tarsus of unknown insect, and some stellate fagacean trichomes. Type stratum. Mid-late Eocene, 48–34 Ma (Sadowski et al. 2017, 2020; Seyfullah et al. 2018; Bukejs et al. 2019; Kasiński et al. 2020). Type locality. Baltic Sea coast, Yantarny settlement (formerly Palmnicken), Sambian (Samland) Peninsula, Kaliningrad Region, Russia. Description. Measurements: body length 10.9 mm; head length 0.9 mm, head width (across compound eyes) 1.9 mm; pronotum length 2.3 mm, pronotal maximum width 4.5 mm; elytral length 7.6 mm, elytral maximum combined width 4.2 mm. Body elongate-oval, nearly parallel-sided, slightly convex; unicolorous, dark brown (as preserved), shining. Pubescence: elytra and apparently pronotum with short, fine, recumbent setae. Head subtrapezoidal, with fine (smaller than one compound eye facet) and rather dense punctation, distance between punctures slightly larger than diameter of one puncture; narrower than anterior pronotal margin; epistome with widely rounded apical margin; fronto-epistomal suture indistinct, slightly impressed laterally. Frons slightly convex, about 2.8× as wide as eye width (between anterior compound eye margins). Genae regularly rounded; outer margin of head without emargination between gena and epistoma. Compound eyes large, convex, reniform, oblique in dorsal view, constricted by genal cantus; dorsal part smaller than ventral part. Tempora very short, narrowed toward neck. Apical maxillary palpomeres securiform, elongate, apical margin obliquely truncate; apical labial palpomeres weakly triangular, subcylindrical. Antennae robust, short, reaching approximately posterior one-fourth of pronotal length, insertion concealed by genae; antenna without club but with antennomeres gradually widening to apex subsequent to antennomere 6; scape and pedicel poorly visible in examined specimen, pedicel cylindrical, apparently almost as long as wide, slightly narrower than scape; antennomere 3 subcylindrical, elongate, about 2.1× as long as wide, slightly dilated apically; antennomere 4 conical, elongate, about 1.7× as long as wide, dilated apically; antennomeres 5–10 weakly to distinctly serrate, antennomeres 5–6 slightly elongate, antennomere 7 nearly as long as wide, antennomeres 8–10 transverse, 1.3–1.5× as wide as long; antennomere 11 rounded, as long as wide; relative length ratios of antennomeres 1–11 equal to?:?:17:15:14:13:13:11:11:11:15. Pronotum trapezoidal, strongly transverse, 1.95× as wide as long, widest at mid-length. Lateral margins slightly rounded, almost parallel-sided in posterior half of pronotum, and in anterior half distinctly narrowed toward anterior margin; anterior margin rounded; base bisinuate; all margins bordered. Anterior and posterior angles nearly rectangular. Disc slightly convex, lateral sides flattened. Pronotal punctation fine and rather dense, distance between punctures larger than diameter of one puncture; punctures on disc less conspicuous, smoothed. Prosternum with dense rugosity. Prosternal process narrow, about 0.35× as wide as diameter of procoxa; with longitudinal groove along lateral sides; roundly bent down and weakly projecting posterior to procoxae. Scutellum moderately large, strongly transverse, narrowly subpentagonal, with widely rounded apical margin. Elytra elongate-oval in shape, subparallel-sided, about 1.8× as long as wide, widest in posterior one-third of length, and 3.3× as long as pronotum; elytral base about as wide as base of pronotum; with weakly visible striae of fine, dense, round punctures; first (epipleural) stria tapers to end before the elytral apex and does not join the sutural stria at apex; scutellar striole present; interstriae much wider than striae, slightly convex (nearly flat on disc), densely micropunctate; humeral angles distinct, obtuse. Epipleura wide, not reaching elytral sutural angle, abruptly tapering and ended anterior to elytral apex, widest at humeri and gradually narrowing posteriad, slightly impressed, apparently covered with fine punctation. Metathoracic wings present. Metepisterna with fine, dense punctation; lateral margins almost straight, anterior margin oblique. Metaventrite slightly convex, shiny, with very fine and sparse punctation on disc and with more conspicuous punctation laterally. Legs moderately long and rather slender, with fine and dense punctation; moderately pubescent with fine, recumbent setae. Femora spindle-shaped, flattened, ventrally with longitudinal groove for tibiae reception. Tibiae thin and almost straight, slightly dilated apically; with at least one visible apical spur; without modifications. Tarsi long, rather slender; tarsomere 1 with dense, fine, golden setae ventrally, not arranged in two rows; relative length ratios of mesotarsomeres 1–5 equal to 3:2:2:2:5. Tarsal claws symmetrical, simple, large, strongly divergent. Abdomen with five visible ventrites, ventrites 1–3 equal in length, intersegmental membranes between ventrites 3–5 present; covered with fine, dense punctation, and with longitudinal wrinkles laterally; glabrous. Etymology. The epithet of this new species is patronymic, named in the memory of the Hungarian entomologist Ottó Merkl (1957–2021), our friend and colleague, and a renowned specialist on Tenebrionoidea of the world. Differential diagnosis. See the diagnosis of the subgenus.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.544
GPT teacher head0.434
Teacher spread0.110 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicMeta-analysis and systematic reviews→French-language works237,207→