MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931677764 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.8408292

Chrysomelinae Latreille 1802

2023· article· en· W6931677764 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular Prevention
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsApex (geometry)Process (computing)Base (topology)Key (lock)Projection (relational algebra)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Identification key for Chrysomelinae genera occurring in Brazil (except Aeneolucentia, Jermaniella, and Pandona) 1 Mesoventral process with spiniform projection (fig. 1)........................................................2. - Mesoventral process without spiniform projection............................................................4. 2(1) Converging claws (fig. 2); apex of tarsomere V dorsally emargined (fig. 2). Distribution: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, British Guiana, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, French Guiana, Guatemala, Mexico, Nicaragua, Paraguay, Parama, Peru, and Venezuela .......................................................................... Doryphora Illiger, 1807. - Divergent claws (fig. 3); apex of tarsomere V dorsally not emargined (fig. 3).......................................3. 3(2) Antennomeres IX and X longer than wide (fig. 4). Distribution: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, British Guiana, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, French Guiana, Guatemala, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Suriname, Uruguay, and Venezuela ........................................................................ Platyphora Gistel, 1857. - Antennomeres IX and X wider than long (fig. 5). Distribution: Brazil, Ecuador, and Peru .............................................................................................. Dorysterna Guérin-Méneville, 1855. 4(1) Metaventral process elongate, with base twice as wide as apex (fig. 6). Distribution: Brazil .......... Metastyla Chapuis, 1874. - Metaventral process not elongated........................................................................5. 5(4) Base of prosternal process projected, usually forming a nearly straight angle, more visible in lateral view (fig. 7)..........6. - Base of prosternal process not projected....................................................................7. 6(5) Smaller body size, usually 6.5–9 mm long; apex of prosternal process 3x wider than base (fig. 8). Distribution: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, British Guiana, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, French Guiana, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Suriname, and Venezuela ............................................................... Desmogramma Erichson, 1847. - Larger body size, usually 9.2–12 mm long; apex of prosternal process 1.5x wider than base (fig. 9). Distribution: Brazil ................................................................................. Gramodesmma Achard, 1923. 7(5) Bifid or appendiculated claws (fig. 10)....................................................................8. - Simple claws........................................................................................13. 8(7) Outer margin of elytra abruptly emargined at middle (fig. 11); apex of mesotibiae and metatibiae strongly widened, with oblique margin (fig. 12); bifid claws. Distribution: Brazil .............................. Trochalonota Westwood, 1834. - Outer margin of elytra not emarginate at middle (fig. 13); apex of mesotibiae and metatibiae slightly enlarged or not enlarged, with a straight or rounded margin (fig. 14); appendiculated claws................................................9. 9(8) Head usually visible in dorsal view; pronotum slightly convex; epipleura with anterior third slightly enlarged and slightly oblique or not (fig. 15)................................................................................10. - Head usually not visible in dorsal view; pronotum strongly convex; epipleura with anterior third strongly enlarged and oblique (fig. 16)............................................................................................12. 10(9) Prosternal process with apex as wide as base, and anterior third not elevated (fig. 17); mesoventral process almost straight and with a depression on each side (fig. 17). Distribution: Brazil ................................... Pixis Chevrolat, 1843. - Prosternal process with apex wider than base, and anterior third slightly elevated (fig. 18); mesoventral process oblique and without depression (fig. 18)............................................................................ 11. 11(10) Smaller body size, usually 3–4.5 mm long; antennomeres slightly globose (fig. 19). Distribution: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil and Peru .............................................................................. Gavirga Stål, 1860. - Larger body size, usually 5–8 mm long; antennomeres elongated (fig. 20). Distribution: Argentina, Brazil, Chile, French Guiana, and Uruguay ............................................................. Leioplacis Chevrolat, 1843. 12(9) Antemomers V–VIII with elongated base and an apical lobe (fig. 21). Distribution: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, and Venezuela ...................................................................... Planagetes Chevrolat, 1843. - Antemomers V–VIII with short base and without apical lobe (fig. 22). Distribution: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, and French Guiana ................................................................................ Limenta Stål, 1860. 13(7) Long antennae, usually reaching or exceeding half the elytra (fig. 23). Distribution: Bolivia, Brazil, British Guiana, Colombia, Ecuador, Guatemala, Peru, and Venezuela .............................................. Proseicela Chevrolat, 1836. - Short antennae, usually not reaching or extending half the elytra................................................14. 14(13) Convergent claws (fig. 24). Distribution: Argentina, Australia, Bolivia, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Georgia, Guatemala, Honduras, India, Mexico, Nicaragua, Pakistan, Panama, Paraguay, Peru, Russia, South Africa, Spain, Sri Lanka, Ukraine, Uruguay, USA, and Venezuela ....................................... Zygogramma Chevrolat, 1836. - Divergent claws......................................................................................15. 15(14) Tarsomere V with one or two spiniform ventroapical projections (figs. 25, 26).....................................16. - Tarsomere V without projection.........................................................................20. 16(15) Tarsomere V with one ventroapical projection (fig. 25). Distribution: Algeria, Antigua and Barbuda, Argentina, Australia, Belize, Bolivia, Brazil, British Guiana, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador, England, Fiji, French Guiana, Germany, Grenada, Guatemata, Honduras, Mexico, New Caledonia, Nicaragua, Northern Ireland, Panama, Papua New Guinea, Paraguay, Peru, Portugal, Saint-Pierre and Miquelon, Samoa, Scotland, Solomon Islands, Suriname, Tonga, Trinidad and Tobago, Uruguay, USA, Vanuatu, Venezuela, and Wales .............................. Calligrapha Chevrolat, 1836. - Tarsomere V with two ventroapical projections (fig. 26)......................................................17. 17(16) Antennomeres longer than wide (fig. 27)..................................................................18. - Antennomeres wider than long (fig. 28)...................................................................19. 18(17) Dorsal surface matte; maxillary palpomere IV with slightly oblique apical margin (fig. 29). Distribution: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Ecuador, Paraguay, Peru, and Uruguay ........................... Cosmogramma Erichson, 1847. - Dorsal surface bright; maxillary palpomere IV with straight apical margin (fig. 30). Distribution: Brazil and Peru ................................................................................. Monocampta Motschulsky, 1860. 19(17) Body form globose; pronotum with uniform punctuation; mesoventral process without a depression on each side (fig. 31). Distribution: Brazil ............................................................... Eugonycha Chevrolat, 1843. - Body form elongated; pronotum with punctuation concentrated on the sides; mesoventral process with a depression on each side (fig. 32). Distribution: Brazil ................................................... Linographa Motschoulsky, 1860. 20(15) Front and clypeus with projected horn–shaped sides (figs. 33, 34). Distribution: Argentina, Brazil, and Paraguay ............................................................................................ Eustilodes Achard, 1923. - Front and clypeus not projected.........................................................................21. 21(20) Metaventral process more prominent than mesoventral process (fig. 35)..........................................22. - Metaventral process as prominent or less prominent than mesoventral process (fig. 36)..........................23. 22(21) Prosternal process with a thin keel extending from base to apex (fig. 37). Distribution: Brazil ......... Dinahia Bechyně, 1946. - Prosternal process with a longitudinal depression extending from base to apex (fig. 38). Distribution: Brazil .......................................................................................... Grammomades Achard, 1923. 23(21) Supraocular suture well defined (fig. 39); clypeus as long as wide (fig. 39); prosternal process with apex 2x wider than base (fig. 40). Distribution: Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Peru, Uruguay, and USA ...... Microtheca Stål, 1860. - Supraocular suture absent or barely defined (fig. 41); clypeus wider than long (fig. 41); prosternal process with apex as wide as base (fig. 42)........................................................................................24. 24(23) Mesoventral process 1.5–2x wider than long (fig. 42).........................................................25. - Mesoventral process 4x wider than long (fig. 43)............................................................28. 25(24) Mesoventral process with anterior margin emargined and slightly raised (fig. 44)...................................26. - Mesoventral process with anterior margin entire and slightly oblique or straight (fig. 45)..........................27. 26(25) Meta

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.758
Threshold uncertainty score0.987

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.047

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicHealth Promotion and Cardiovascular PreventionFrench-language works237,207