Archaeological desk-based assessment and archaeological building survey at High Cleugh Head, Hallbankgate, Brampton
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The archaeological building survey at High Cleugh Head strongly suggests the buildings under review, namely a domestic farmhouse, a cottage converted to a barn and a purpose built barn are generally no earlier than the mid 19th Century. The buildings were heavily renovated during the latter part of the 20th Century with windows replaced by false leaded glazing, a new roof and considerable internal renovation and redecoration that was still present to the surveyor masking the building's fabric. Additional modern utilitarian structures were added including a garage, a utility room, storage areas formed by lean-to's and additional cattle stalls. The outbuilding was relatively modern constructions for purely functional use. An enigmatic earthwork has been accounted as a modern folly according to local knowledge. Due to the high level of adaptation and alteration, the buildings per se have little architectural merit and produced no substantive diagnostic evidence regarding architectural embellishments, features or traits. No connection could be found with industrial activity prevalent in this area between the 18th and early 20th centuries
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".