MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931678393 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7003352

Copelatus caelatipennis subsp. princeps Young 1963

2022· article· en· W6931678393 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicOperations Management Techniques
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInstarNearctic ecozoneLarvaMargin (machine learning)DorsumTable (database)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Copelatus caelatipennis princeps Young, 1963 Source of material. The two larvae studied (one instar II and one instar III) were associated with adults collected at the following locality: USA. Florida, Orlando. Junction International Drive & Hwy 523, 26–28.IX.2016. 28°53.83’N 81°37.92’W; Y. Alarie leg. The identification is firm as C. caelatipennis princeps is the only Copelatus species known from that locality. Diagnosis (instar III). The third instar of Copelatus c. princeps can easily be distinguished from that of the other species studied in this paper by the following combination of characters: HL = 0.80 mm; L3 <2.00 mm; U <0.40 mm; head capsule rounded to subquadrate, strongly constricted at level of occipital region (Fig. 17), scale-like sculpticels present over frontoclypeus and parietale; anterior margin of frontoclypeus narrowly convex, extending mesally well beyond level of adnasalia (Fig. 17); adnasalia margined with short bluntly rounded and truncated teeth (Fig. 63); MP2/MP1> 1.50; GA/MP1> 1.50; 1.30 <LP2/LP1 <1.90; inner margin of stipes lacking a dorsal linear row of spinulae; profemur with less than 3 PV and 4 AV secondary setae; metafemur with less than 3 AV secondary setae; urogomphus composed of one urogomphomere; U/HW = 0.40; U/LAS = 0.50; Nearctic and Neotropical. Description, instar II Body: Measurements and ratios aimed to characterize body shape are shown in Table 4. Head: Head capsule rounded to subquadrate, strongly constricted at level of occiput; anterior margin of frontoclypeus narrowly convex, extending well beyond level of adnasalia; adnasalia margined with short bluntly rounded and truncated teeth (see Fig. 63); scale-like sculpticels well-developed over frontoclypeus and parietale; HL = 0.58 mm; A/MP = 1.41; MP/LP = 1.85; MP2/MP1 = 1.73; GA/MP1 = 2.00; LP2/LP1 = 1.73; MNL/MNW = 2.72. Thorax: L3 = 1.05 mm. Abdomen: LAS = 0.39 mm; LAS subconical, not constricted posteriorly at point of insertion of urogomphi. Urogomphus: U = 0.22 mm, composed of one urogomphomere; U/HW = 0.38; U/LAS = 0.58. Chaetotaxy: Parietale with 7 temporal spines; position and number of secondary setae on legs are shown in Table 5. Description, instar III (Figs 17–18, 63). As second-instar larva except as follows: Body: Measurements and ratios aimed to characterize body shape are shown in Table 6. Head (Figs 18, 63): HL = 0.81 mm; A/MP = 1.50; MP/LP = 1.98; MP2/MP1 = 1.67; GA/MP1 = 2.00; LP2/LP1 = 1.51; MNL/MNW = 2.58. Thorax: L3 = 1.58 mm. Abdomen (Fig. 18): LAS = 0.64 mm; U = 0.34 mm; U/HW = 0.43; U/LAS = 0.52. Chaetotaxy: Parietale with 10–12 temporal spines; position and number of secondary setae on legs are shown in Table 7.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicOperations Management TechniquesFrench-language works237,207