MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931682954 · doi:10.5683/sp2/bl6r3j

Fairfields House - Integrated Project Dossier (2014)

2020· dataset· en· W6931682954 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueBorealis · 2020
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUltrasound in Clinical Applications
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArchitectureAsideBedroomWest virginiaHectare

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The property at 3080 Richmond Road was first purchased by William Bell in the 1820s. Originally the 660 acres of land were cultivated for farming. In later years, the land was subdivided and sections sold. The home, standing on 1.8 hectares of land, remained in the Bell family for nearly 175 years. As stated, between the years of 1842 and 1850, the Bell family originally constructed the Fairfields farmhouse – at the time, the house was referred to as Lakeview Farm. In August of 1870, an extensive forest and brush fire swept through the West Carleton area and destroyed the entire interior of the house, leaving only the exterior stone walls intact. The house was soon rebuilt in a Gothic Revival style. Through the latter nineteenth century and into the early twentieth centuries, the Bells property became one of the most successful dairy enterprises in eastern Ontario and within the overall Ontario dairy farm industry. At one time the Bell farm operated on 600 acres of farmland; the farm has several barns and sheds to increase productivity. Presently (2014) all other structures aside from the main farmhouse have been demolished. Some of the foundations are still visible, however, the site has significantly been reduced due to subdivision and subsequent developing. Fairfields is one of the few remaining nineteenth-century structures in west-end Ottawa with such a long history. Unfortunately, due to the fire in 1870, a majority of surrounding architecture was destroyed – there are no earlier houses on the south side of Richmond Rd. This is the Integrated Project Dossier compiled by a group of undergrad students of the Architectural Conservation and Sustainability Program (Engineers and architects) at Carleton University for the CIVE3207 (ARCN4100) Historic Site Recording and Assessment course in 2014.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.237
Threshold uncertainty score0.794

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2370.053

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBorealisSame topicUltrasound in Clinical ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207