MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931685926 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7003346

Copelatus alternatus Sharp 1882

2022· article· en· W6931685926 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInstarLarvaHead (geology)DorsumConstrictionTable (database)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Copelatus alternatus Sharp, 1882 Source of material. All instar larvae studied were associated with adults collected at the following locality: Argentina, Tucumán Province. El Cochuna Provincial Park, 3/ 9-XII-2007, roadside pond; M. C. Michat leg. The identification is firm as C. alternatus is the only Copelatus species known from that locality. Diagnosis (instar III). The third instar of Copelatus alternatus can easily be distinguished from that of the other species studied in this paper by the following combination of characters: HL = 0.90 mm; L3 <2.00 mm; U <0.40 mm; head capsule rounded, slightly constricted at level of occipital region (Fig. 15) with scale-like sculpticels present over frontoclypeus and parietale; anterior margin of frontoclypeus narrowly convex, extending mesally at about level of adnasalia (Fig. 15); adnasalia margined with a mix of bluntly rounded and truncated teeth (Fig. 63); MP2/MP1> 1.50; GA/MP1> 1.50; 1.30 <LP2/LP1 <1.90; inner margin of stipes lacking a dorsal linear row of spinulae; profemur with less than 3 PV and 4 AV secondary setae; metafemur with less than 3 AV secondary setae; urogomphus composed of one urogomphomere; U/HW <0.40; U/LAS <0.50; Neotropical. Description, instar I (Figs 1–14) Body: Measurements and ratios aimed to characterize body shape are shown in Table 2. (1) Michat & Torres (2009) (1) Michat & Torres (2009) Head (Figs 1–9): HL = 0.45–0.47 mm; Head capsule rounded, lacking a clear constriction at level of occiput; occipital suture absent; anterior margin of frontoclypeus lightly convex, extending mesally at about level of adnasalia; A/MP = 1.48–1.60; MP/LP = 1.70–1.79; MP2/MP1 = 1.96–2.17; GA/MP1 = 2.50–3.04; LP2/LP1 = 2.27–2.50; MNL/MNW = 2.75–2.88. Thorax (Figs 10–11): L3 = 0.83–0.88 mm. Abdomen (Figs 12–14): LAS = 0.30–0.32 mm; LAS subcylindrical, not constricted posteriorly at point of insertion of urogomphi. Urogomphus: U = 0.18–0.19 mm, composed of one urogomphomere; U/HW = 0.36–0.39; U/LAS = 0.56–0.65. Chaetotaxy (Figs 1–14): Position and number of additional setae on legs are shown in Table 3 and Figs 10– 11. Description, instar II. As first-instar larva except as follows: Body: Measurements and ratios aimed to characterize body shape are shown in Table 4. Head: HL = 0.65 mm; anterior margin of frontoclypeus more narrowly convex; scale-like sculpticels welldeveloped over frontoclypeus and parietale; adnasalia margined with short bluntly rounded and truncated teeth (see Fig. 63); occipital suture present; A/MP = 1.59–1.64; MP/LP = 1.64–1.76; MP2/MP1 = 2.00–2.14; GA/MP1 = 2.38–2.57; LP2/LP1 = 1.78–1.89; MNL/MNW = 2.60–2.78. Thorax: L3 = 1.32–1.34 mm. Abdomen: LAS = 0.43–0.44 mm; LAS subcylindrical to subconical, less abruptly converging posteriorly at point of insertion of urogomphi. Urogomphus: U = 0.23–0.24 mm, composed of one urogomphomere; U/HW = 0.31–0.32; U/LAS = 0.54–0.56. Chaetotaxy: Parietale with 3–5 temporal spines; position and number of secondary setae on legs are shown in Table 5. Description, instar III (Figs 15–16, 63). As second-instar larva except as follows: Body: Measurements and ratios aimed to characterize body shape are shown in Table 6. Head (Figs 15, 63): HL = 0.88–0.89 mm; A/MP = 1.52–1.56; MP/LP = 1.77–1.90; MP2/MP1 = 1.58–1.75; GA/MP1 = 1.83–2.00; LP2/LP1 = 1.42–1.58; MNL/MNW = 2.43–2.83. Thorax: L3 = 1.74–1.81 mm. Abdomen (Fig. 16): LAS = 0.68–0.73 mm; U = 0.27–0.30 mm; U/HW = 0.27–0.32; U/LAS = 0.37–0.44. Chaetotaxy: Parietale with 3–7 temporal spines. Position and number of secondary setae on legs are shown in Table 7.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.154
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicAdvanced Causal Inference TechniquesFrench-language works237,207