Bibliographic record
Abstract
Family ANGUILLICOLIDAE Yamaguti, 1935 Preamble: Five species of the eel swim bladder nematode Anguillicola are recognised currently: A. globiceps Yamaguti, 1935 (type species); A. australiensis Johnston & Mawson, 1940; A. crassus Kuwahara, Niimi & Itagaki, 1974; A. novaezelandiae Moravec & Taraschewski, 1988; and A. papernai Moravec & Taraschewski, 1988. Reports of A. crassus as an invasive species in American eels (Anguilla rostrata) in Canadian and other North American waters are of concern because the nematode causes morbidity and mortality in Japanese and European eels, A. japonica and A. anguilla (Laetsch et al. 2012). Molecular analyses by Laetsch et al. (op. cit.) do not support Moravec’s (2006) division of the Family Anguillicolidae Yamaguti, 1935, into the genera Anguillicola Yamaguti, 1935, and Anguillicoloides Moravec & Taraschewski, 1988. Further analyses might not support Moravec & Taraschewski’s (1988) erection of the subgenera Anguillicola and Anguillicoloides within Anguillicola. Indeed, in an exploration of spirurine evolutionary relationships Wijová, Moravec, Horák & Lukeš (2006) referred, without comment, to the binomen Anguillicola crassus; they also stated that “the genus Anguillicola should be evaluated within an independent Superfamily Anguillicoloidea, whose position within a higher taxonomic unit remains uncertain at best”. Future molecular analyses might shed light on such problems. Evidence that forage fish species in North America serve as paratenic hosts of Anguillicola crassus was provided by Li et al. (2015). Of Canadian interest was the finding of two A. crassus L 3 in one of nine Atlantic tomcod (Microgadus tomcod) from the Mira River, Cape Breton, Nova Scotia; one of these L3 was 846µm long and 33µm wide. Family diagnosis (after Moravec 2013). Buccal capsule well developed, with numerous peribuccal teeth. Cuticle smooth, spinose or with papilla-like excrescences. Four submedian cephalic papillae present. Oesophagus short, undivided. Males with common cloacal duct opening on prominent process. Preanal and postanal papillae present. Vulva well developed, situated in posterior half of body. Parasites of swim bladder of eels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".