MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931704808 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6265521

Phryxe pecosensis Townsend 1926

2005· article· en· W6931704808 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChoristoneura fumiferanaSpruce budwormHost (biology)Tortricidae

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Phryxe pecosensis (Townsend, 1926), Fig. 49 Host records ex. Choristoneura conflictana: Prentice 1955 (SK, MB); Schaffner 1959, ex. Archips conflictana (northeastern United States); † Arnaud 1978 (SK, MB, ME); † Huber et al. 1996 (America north of Mexico). Host records ex. Choristoneura fumiferana: Johannsen 1913, as Exorista vulgaris ex. Tortrix fumiferana (ME); Tothill 1913, as Exorista vulgaris ex. Tortrix fumiferana (QC); † Winn & Beaulieu 1915, as Exorista vulgaris ex. Tortrix fumiferana (QC); Wilkes & Anderson 1947, ex. Archips fumiferana (ON, QC); Daviault 1950 (QC); Dowden et al. 1951, ex. Archips fumiferana (NY); Jaynes & Drooz 1952 (NY, ME); Raizenne 1952 (ON); Dowden et al. 1953 (ME); Miller 1955 (NB); McGugan & Blais 1959 (ON); Schaffner 1959, as Phryxe vulgaris (northeastern United States); Blais 1960 (QC); MacDonald & Webb 1963 (NB); † Miller 1963 (NB); Blais 1965 (QC); † Arnaud 1978, as Phryxe vulgaris (MA, QC, ME); † Tilles & Woodley 1984 (ME); Hébert et al. 1989 (QC); Huber et al. 1996 (NB); † Huber et al. 1996, as Phryxe vulgaris (America north of Mexico); Cappuccino et al. 1999 (QC). Host records ex. Choristoneura fumiferana and/or Choristoneura occidentalis: Brown 1941, as Zenillia vulgaris ex. Cacoecia fumiferana (Canada); Sellers 1943, ex. Archips fumiferana (North America); Dowden et al. 1948, ex. Archips fumiferana (North America); † Zwolfer 1961, ex. C. fumiferana (North America); † Arnaud 1978, ex. C. fumiferana (BC, OR, ON, QC, NB, NF, ME, NY). Host records ex. Choristoneura fumiferana, Choristoneura occidentalis and/or Choristoneura pinus: † Ross 1952, ex. spruce and/or jack pine budworm (Canada). Host records ex. Choristoneura occidentalis: McKnight 1974 (CO); Harris & Dawson 1979 (BC). Host records probably ex. Choristoneura occidentalis: Wilkes et al. 1949, ex. C. fumiferana (BC); Carolin & Coulter 1959, ex. C. fumiferana (OR); † Coppel 1960, ex. C. fumiferana (BC). Host records ex. Choristoneura pinus: Benjamin & Drooz 1954 (MI); Drooz & Benjamin 1956 (MI); Kulman & Hodson 1961 (MN); Dixon & Benjamin 1963 (WI); Allen et al. 1969 (MI); † Arnaud 1978 (MN, WI, MI); † Huber et al. 1996 (America north of Mexico). Host records ex. Choristoneura rosaceana: Raizenne 1952, ex. Archips rosaceana (ON); † Arnaud 1978 (ON); † Huber et al. 1996 (America north of Mexico). Phryxe pecosensis ranges from Alaska to Newfoundland, and south to California and New Mexico in the West and Virginia in the East. It is a dark coloured species about 4.0–7.5mm long. The adult and puparium resemble those of the related Madremyia saundersii, and the puparia of the two species (Figs. 24–25) are not always easily distinguished. Phryxe pecosensis was included in a key to the puparia of dipterous parasitoids of Choristoneura species by Ross (1952) and in a key to the adults of dipterous parasitoids of C. occidentalis (as C. fumiferana) in British Columbia by Coppel (1960). The egg, larval instars and puparium were described by Maw and Coppel (1953). Phryxe vulgaris (Fallén) is a widely distributed Holarctic species that is very similar in appearance to P. pecosensis. This similarity has resulted in frequent misidentifications of P. pecosensis as P. vulgaris in the literature. Sellers (1943) provided useful characters by which to separate the species, but the differences between the species are so subtle that misidentifications continue to occur. Sellers (1943) considered host records of P. v u l g a r i s from C. fumiferana (as Archips fumiferana) to be based on misidentifications of P. pecosensis, and I agree with his assessment. Phryxe pecosensis is an eryciine tachinid that develops mature eggs within the female reproductive system. In a study of the biology of this species, Maw and Coppel (1953) found that eggs are deposited directly on the host. The first instar usually emerges soon after egg deposition, exiting through the ventral surface of the egg and burrowing into the host. Maw and Coppel (1953) observed a maximum deposition of 32 eggs in the laboratory but found many more eggs in the reproductive systems of dissected females, so females probably deposit close to 100 eggs under natural conditions. Females have a preoviposition period of about 10 days and adults live up to about 50 days (Maw & Coppel 1953). Phryxe pecosensis attacks late instar larvae of Choristoneura species and emerges from the sixth instar or pupa (Dowden et al. 1948; Carolin & Coulter 1959; Allen et al. 1969; McKnight 1974). The fully mature maggot leaves the host to pupariate elsewhere (Sellers 1943; Maw & Coppel 1953). Adults are active from May to October, there are two or more generations per year, and the parasitoid overwinters as a larva in an alternate host (Schaffner & Griswold 1934; Schaffner 1959). Phryxe pecosensis is a commonly recorded parasitoid of Choristoneura species that is generally responsible for low levels of parasitism but occasionally has been found at higher levels. Parasitism of C. pinus was reported as low (less than 3% parasitism of late larvae) in Michigan by Benjamin and Drooz (1954) and Allen et al. (1969) and in Wisconsin by Dixon and Benjamin (1963). In Quebec, Daviault (1950) reported spruce budworm parasitism as high as 7.4% in larvae and 1% in pupae, whereas Blais (1960) reported relative parasitism as high as 15%. In New York, Dowden et al. (1951) reported parasitism of spruce budworm larvae as high as 18% and of pupae as high as 6%. Jaynes and Drooz (1952) found up to 24% parasitism of mature larvae of spruce budworm in New York and up to 12% parasitism of budworm larvae in Maine. Tilles and Woodley (1984) included P. pecosensis as one of five tachinids in their manual of spruce budworm parasitoids in Maine. Parasitism in the West has been reported as low. Wilkes et al. (1949) ranked P. pecosensis fifteen among the 15 dominant dipterous and hymenopterous parasitoids of C. occidentalis (as C. fumiferana) in British Columbia. The hosts from which P. pecosensis has been reported are many and varied: a species of Tenthredinidae (Hymenoptera), a species each in Danaidae, Hesperiidae, Pieridae, and Saturniidae, two species of Pyralidae, several species in each of Geometridae and Noctuidae, and about ten species of Tortricidae (Arnaud 1978).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.727
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0330.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.333
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it