Oiceoptoma noveboracense Forster 1771
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Oiceoptoma noveboracense (Forster, 1771) Figs. 21 34, 47 Silpha noveboracensis Forster, 1771: 17 (see Peck and Miller (1993) for synonymy). Diagnosis. Body length 13–16 mm, broadly oval to subparallel, brown to black, pronotum with red-orange margins. Head with small eyes, short row of long erect hairs behind each eye. Pronotum broadest at base, disc with short golden hairs. Elytral apices conjointly rounded; humerus with tooth; disc tricostate, intervals distally with weak rugulose sculpturing; epipleuron wide in posterior half with upper oblique portion twice width of lower vertical portion, coloration not differing from remainder of body. Hind femur of males unmodified. Range. Nova Scotia south to Mississippi, west to Alberta, Montana and Texas (Anderson & Peck 1985, Peck & Kaulbars 1987). Texas distribution. See Fig. 47. This species is confined to the northeastern areas of the Texan and Austroriparian biotic provinces of Texas. It occurs in the following Texas vegetational areas: pineywoods and post oak savannah. Confirmed counties (2): Lamar, Wood. Collections: SFAC. Seasonality in Texas. See Fig. 34. The adult seasonality profile of this species (based on 7 occurrence records: Appendix I) is unimodal, with a peak in early spring, but the available Texas data are limited. Biological Notes. Anderson and Peck (1985) report that adults are primarily diurnal and are most commonly found in forested habitats. Lingafelter (1995) also states that this species is mainly a woodland species. Data from examined labels. Collecting methods: Malaise trap, pit-fall trap. Habitat records: tall grass [Malaise], old growth hardwood forest [Malaise], pine and oak [pit-fall traps], flowers. There are only seven occurrence records of this species in Texas. This species is restricted to the northeastern forested areas of the state. Cole (1942), Schubeck (1969, 1983), and Anderson (1982) discussed the natural history of this species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".