MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931714026 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7995168

Procladius (Holotanypus) prolongatus Roback 1971

2018· article· en· W6931714026 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAnimal Disease Management and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrench hornConstrictionAperture (computer memory)DorsumUnsaturated polyester

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Procladius (Holotanypus) prolongatus Roback Material examined. USA: Alaska, Loon Pond, a tundra pond on the west edge of Prudhoe Bay, 3-VII-1980, col. Malcom Butler. Pupa (n = 8), 4 males, 4 females. Total length 7.65-8.47, 8.02 mm (n = 8) Cephalothorax. Light brown. Thoracic horn (Fig. 9) 630-760, 682 µm long (n = 16); 240-300, 265 µm wide (n = 13); covered evenly with short teeth; no reticulation; plastron plate 140-200, 170 µm long (n = 16); 252-330, 279 µm wide (n = 13); apical constriction of horn chamber 110-148, 130 µm wide (n = 5) with a short neck often obscured by the large, dark plastron plate; an oval aperture between the neck and atrium is often elongate and distinct; length/width of horn 2.3-2.78, 2.57; width of plastron plate/width of constriction 1.89-2.35, 2.06 (n = 5). Respiratory atrium, neck and plastron plate dark brown. Plastron plate width usually equal to or wider than horn width. Abdomen. Color pattern 3, but usually a solid light brown with no pale patches. Shagreen (Fig. 10) of T IV medially with elongate (4-7 µm) single sharp points. Shagreen on T VIII similar in size, shape, and pattern, although less robust than on other tergites. LS taeniae of VII at 0.38, 0.62, 0.81, 0.96 (n = 6) segment length. LS taeniae of VIII at 0.16, 0.35, 0.57, 0.78, 0.95 (n = 6) segment length. Anal lobe (Fig. 11) length 920-1000, 964 µm; 30-48, 40 (n = 16) spines on outer margin; largest spines 40- 70 µm posterolateral, with distance between spines equal or wider than width of spine bases; smallest apical and lateral spines 10-20 µm long; posterior edge indented, apical spines clustered on a projection (except one specimen with no projection and no indentation along posterior edge). Remarks. Roback (1980) described features that suggested subgeneric status for P. prolongatus, and he formally implemented this distinction among Holotanypus groups in Roback (1982). From associated Prudhoe Bay material, we can provide insight into the immature traits used to support the subgenus. The anal lobes from Roback’s Barrow, Alaska, specimens were described as “unusually shaped” with a “projecting outer curve”. The Prudhoe Bay specimens usually do have a rounded lateral shape, but none are as expansive as in Roback’s description and some also have lateral edges that are straight. Based on descriptions in Roback (1980) and material from Isle Royale, Michigan, P. dentus also has a large anal lobe that can be rounded laterally. P. dentus and prolongatus can both have a fold near the respiratory organ neck, but in both species this feature is not always observed. Therefore, these two features are not diagnostic and without a series of specimens may create confusion when using the key in Roback (1980). These species may be reliably separated by tergite IV and VIII shagreen, which is elongate (4-7 µm) in P. prolongatus and short (1-4 µm) in P. dentus. In addition, the number of spines on the anal lobe will distinguish these species, with 30-48 in P. prolongatus and 56-63 (from Isle Royale) and 68 (from the single specimen reported by Roback) in P. dentus. Larvae have one proleg that is apparently diagnostic in Procladius, with a wide, triangular base and a tight apical hook (see figure 244, Roback 1980). Prudhoe Bay tundra pond specimens have this feature. Larvae of P. dentus, though undescribed, should presumably have simple proleg claws, similar to all other known larvae in Holotanypus (Roback 1982). Known range is Nunavut, Canada, and Alaska, USA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicAnimal Disease Management and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207