Factors Influencing Learning Task Failure in the Domestic Dog (Canis lupus familiaris)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dog cognition research often requires dogs to meet initial screening criteria and complete preliminary behavioural tasks to proceed with subsequent experimental task phases. Reasons for the excluded dogs’ inability to meet the criteria, especially in the absence of major procedural errors, remain uncertain, whether stemming from cognitive differences, lack of motivation for rewards, or lack of specific experiences in dogs’ learning history. Our objective was to identify predictors of failure, shedding light on potential differences between the populations of dogs typically studied in cognitive research and the general dog population. A total of 150 pure-bred dogs performed a hand-touch learning task with their owners. The task consisted of different phases, each necessitating the dog to fulfill specific criteria before progressing to the subsequent phase. Inability to meet the specified task criteria led to failure. Binomial logistic regression was used to evaluate the probability of failure, incorporating dogs’ characteristics, training history, reward responsiveness, and impulsivity scores, along with factors specifying owners’ previous experiences with dogs as independent variables. Results indicated a higher likelihood of task failure associated with advancing age, lower food responsiveness scores, being a non-sporting dog, receiving non-food rewards in previous training, lack of familiarity with the hand-touch behaviour, along with the lack of dog training knowledge and a history of owning fewer dogs by the owner. Factors predicting task failure also varied between breed clades, with reward responsiveness being more influential in some clades, while training-related factors were more significant in others. This variation likely reflects breed-specific differences in learning profile and variations in responsiveness to external influences. Cognitive research may, therefore, be biased towards studying a certain group of dogs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".