MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6931715393 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5997641

Japanagromyza viridula Coquillett

2018· article· en· W6931715393 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicMeta-analysis and systematic reviews
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrassFagaceaeQuercus serrataPuerto rican

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Japanagromyza viridula (Coquillett) (Figs. 81–82) Material examined. MASSACHUSETTS: Franklin Co., Northfield, power lines W of Old Wendell Rd., 1.vi.2016, em. 23–25.vi.2016, C.S. Eiseman, ex Quercus alba, #CSE2617, CNC654095–654099 (5♂); Nantucket Co., Nantucket, Squam Swamp, 12.vi.2013., em. 30.vi.2013, C.S. Eiseman, ex Quercus velutina, #CSE619, CNC392713 (1♂); Nantucket, Squam Farm, 9.vi.2013, em. 30.vi.2013, C.S. Eiseman, ex Quercus ilicifolia, #CSE627, CNC358584, CNC358585 (2♀); OKLAHOMA: Payne Co., Mehan, 36.014339° N, -96.996744° W, 18.iv.2017, em. 18–21.v.2017, M.W. Palmer, ex Quercus velutina, #CSE3681, CNC939898 (3♂); 18.iv.2017, em. 9.v.2017, M.W. Palmer, ex Quercus stellata, #CSE3734, CNC939894, CNC939895 (2♂). Hosts. Fagaceae: Castanea mollissima Blume, Quercus * alba L., Q. * ilicifolia Wangenh., Q. rubra L., Q. * stellata Wangenh., Q. * velutina Lam. (Spencer & Steyskal 1986); we have also seen mines on Q. laevis Walter, Q. macrocarpa Michx., and Q. margaretta (Ashe) Small. Leaf mine. (Figs. 81–82) A brownish blotch, or sometimes irregularly linear, with frass in irregular lumps. Because mines are formed in leaves that are still expanding, the oviposition site and associated feeding punctures often open into conspicuous holes, and the mined portion of the leaf is disfigured. The mines on Quercus alba had distinct primary and secondary feeding lines (Fig. 81). Puparium. Brown; formed outside the mine. Distribution. USA: GA, IN, KS, MA, ME, NC, *OK, PA, SC, TN, VA; Canada: NS, ON; Puerto Rico. We have also seen photographed leaf mines from IL and NJ. Spencer & Stegmaier (1973) state that it is “virtually certain” that the Puerto Rican specimens mentioned in the original description represent another species, but the basis for this assertion is unclear.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.595
GPT teacher head0.450
Teacher spread0.145 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicMeta-analysis and systematic reviews→French-language works237,207→