Diploneis fossa Jovanovska & Wilson & Hamilton & Stone 2023, sp. nov.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diploneis fossa sp. nov. (LM Figs 178–185, SEM Figs 186–192) Valves are weakly asymmetric, elliptical to linear–elliptical with parallel margins and bluntly round apices (Figs 178–188). The length of the valve is 47.5–64 μm and the width of the valve is 23–27 μm. The axial area is narrow, lanceolate, widening at the center to form a longitudinally elongate and weakly asymmetric central area (Figs 178, 187, 190), 4–5 μm wide. Externally, the canal is lanceolate and slightly expanded in the middle of the valve with three rows of cribrate (<15 poroids) areolae narrowing into one at the valve apices (Fig. 189). Externally, the raphe is filiform, curved with simple proximal ends bent to the same side of the valve; the proximal fissures are positioned in expanded teardrop depressions (Figs 187, 190). The distal raphe ends are unilaterally bent to the same side and terminate at the valve face mantle junction (Figs 188, 189, 192). The striae are parallel at mid-valve becoming radiate towards the valve apices, 8–9 in 10 μm. Striae are uniseriate throughout (Figs 189, 191). The striae are composed of large round to rectangular areolae covered externally with fine pored cribra (>45 poroids), 8–10 in 10 μm. Externally, each areola opens into deep pits. The inter-areolar thickenings have fin-like crest silica ridges serrated with ca. 9–12 fine notched edges (Fig. 189). The fin-like ridges along the canal are slightly bent into semi-circular shape, positioned towards the striae whereas those of the striae are only slightly bent positioned towards the canal, changing opposite direction only at valve mantle (Figs 187, 192). Type:— REPUBLIC OF ZAMBIA, Lake Tanganyika, Isanga Bay, at 768 m elevation; rock scrape, 20 m water depth, collected SCUBA diving, 8°39’10.7” S 31°11’34.8” E, A. Jordan, 8 th October 2021 (holotype designated here, circled specimen BM-108982! = Fig. 184, isotypes ANSP-GC17211!, CANA-129334!). Type material CANA-129329. Registration: http://phycobank.org/103708 Pictures of the isolated specimen:— LM micrograph on 1000× magnification (Fig. S2c). Sequence data:— Plastid gene rbc L sequence (GenBank accession: OQ 660301). Etymology:— The specific epithet ‘ fossa ’ refers to the ditch-like formation of the fin-like crest ridges. Ecology and distribution:— This species has only been observed on the Zambian and Tanzanian coasts of Lake Tanganyika. In the alkaline, moderately mineral-rich and highly transparent waters, it inhabits sandy and muddy substrates (sometimes with mollusk shells) and submerged rocks between 5 and 33 m water depth. The largest population sizes of this species have been found in the southern parts of the lake in Isanga Bay and Mutondwe Island. Smaller population sizes were found in Chituta Bay, Kalambo Falls Lodge, Ndole Bay and in the central parts of the lake in Kalya Bay and Mahale National Park (Fig. 1c, e, f). In the type material, it mostly coexists with D. major sp. nov. while at all other sites it occurs with D. kilhamiana sp. nov., D. cocquytiana sp. nov., D. tumida sp. nov., D. cristata sp. nov., D. salzburgeri sp. nov., D. serrulata sp. nov., and D. duplex sp. nov. Main differential characters:— Valve shape, striae pattern, striae density, external fin-like ornamentations across the valve, fins scattered on the longitudinal canals, areolae formation over the longitudinal canal (thickened virgae), and poroids>45 per areola. Similar species:— Diploneis elongata sp. nov. and Diploneis raetica Lange-Bertalot & Fuhrmann (2020: 119).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".