MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931733413 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6760859

Uroderma convexum Lyon 1902

2019· article· en· W6931733413 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPanamaType localityPacific oceanSimple eye in invertebrates

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

154. Pacific Tent-making Bat Uroderma convexum French: Uroderme de Lyon / German: Pazifik-Zeltfledermaus / Spanish: Urodermo de Lyon Other common names: Arcuate Tent-making Bat Taxonomy. Uroderma convexum lyon, 1902, “Colon, Colombia [= Colon, Colon, Panamal.” Until 2014, Uroderma was thought to include only two species, with U. bilobatum having six subspecies, some of which have been distinguished as valid species through morphometric, karyotypic, and molecular analyses. Uroderma b. molaris, described by W. B. Davis in 1968, with type locality in Palenque, Chiapas, Mexico, seemsto represent a synonym of U. convexum and not a subspecies. Easternmost karyotype of U. convexum (2n = 38) is in Melgar, Tolima Department, in the Colombian inter-Andean valley of the Magdalena River. Monotypic. Distribution. Atlantic side of S Mexico (except Yucatan Peninsula), Guatemala, and Honduras S along both sides of Central America in Nicaragua, Costa Rica, and Panama to N South America in W Colombia and W Ecuador. Descriptive notes. Head—body 59-69 mm (tailless), ear 12-18 mm, hindfoot 9-13 mm, forearm 40-44 mm; weight 13-20 g. The Pacific Tent-making Bat is medium-sized, with dark gray or gray-brown upperparts. Hairs are bicolored, with light pale bases. White stripe extends form back of head to rump. Facial stripes are prominent above and below eye, and upperstripe extends overhead to back of ear. Ears and noseleaft are prominently edged with yellow or white. Tail membrane is relatively long and Ushaped. Main difference between the Pacific Tent-making Bat and the Common Tentmaking Bat (U. bilobatum) is that the molar tooth row of the Pacific Tent-making Batis convex and less nearly parallel. Teeth also are slightly smaller in the Pacific Tent-making Bat, and its rostrum is shorter and broader, with flattened nasals. Chromosomal complement has 2n = 38 and FN = 44. Habitat. Lowlands of Pacific and Caribbean coast below 1200 m. Pacific Tent-making Bats spend much oftheir foraging time in riparian habitats; however, they also forage in mature and secondary forests and several anthropogenic habitats, contributing to dispersal of at least eleven species of plants. Food and Feeding. Diets of species of Uroderma primarily include fruit (mainly figs), followed by small amounts of pollen, nectar, and insects that are associated with fruits or flowers. The Pacific Tent-making Bat eats fruits from c.40 known plant species (13 genera and ten families). Besides Ficus (Moraceae), diets also include Piper (Piperaceae), Philodendron (Araceae), Cecropia (Urticaceae), Solanum (Solanaceae), Vismia (Hypericaceae), Quararibea (Malvaceae), Clusia (Clusiaceae), Brossmum (Moraceae), and Psidium (Myrtaceae). Breeding. Reproduction of the Pacific Tent-making Bat is bimodal polyestry, with young flyting and independently foraging at c.1 month of age. Mating system is harembased, with a single reproductive male and multiple females. Activity patterns. The Pacific Tent-making Batis nocturnal. It roosts in leaf tents, hollow logs, caves, unmodified leaves, and human buildings. One of the most used plants for tents is the coconut tree, but other introduced plants in anthropomorphic habitats such as plantations, gardens, and cattle ranches are used as roosts. Movements, Home range and Social organization. The number of individuals of Pacific Tent-making Bat in a roost depends on the type of roost. It is gregarious and usually found in groups of 15-59 individuals. Night feeding roosts can be up to 1800 m from day roosts, but males frequently restrict movements to fruiting plants within 100 m of their day roosts. Status and Conservation. Not assessed on The [UCN Red List. The Pacific Tent-making Bat was previously considered part of the Common Tent-making Bat, which is classified as Least Concern. A proper assessment of the recently recognized Pacific Tent-making Bat is needed to fully understand its conservation status. Bibliography. Baker & Clark (1987), Baker & Lopez (1970a), Baker, Atchley & McDaniel (1972), Davis (1968), Fleming et al. (1972), Giannini & Kalko (2004), Hoffmann et al. (2003), LaVal & Rodriguez-Herrera (2002), Lobova et al. (2009), Lyon (1902), Mantilla-Meluk (2014), Reid (2009), Rodriguez-Herrera & Wilson (1999), Sagot et al. (2013), Sampaio et al. (2008), Villalobos-Chaves etal. (2015).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.454
Threshold uncertainty score0.958

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0460.043

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlFrench-language works237,207