MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931737462 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6521448

Lithochrysa ferruginea

2022· article· en· W6931737462 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFossil Insects in Amber
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityRoyal British Columbia Museum
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeType localitySynonym (taxonomy)GenusType species

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lithochrysa ferruginea (Cockerell, 1909), stat. res. Figs 17–19 Palaeochrysa ferruginea Cockerell, 1909b: 218, 219, Fig. 6; Cockerell 1914: 717; Carpenter 1935: 266, 267 (as a synonym of Lithochrysa concinnula); Martins-Neto & Vulcano 1989: 189, 190 (as a synonym of Palaeochrysa concinnula); Archibald & Makarkin 2017: 397, 399, 400. Paleochrysa [sic] ferruginea: Rodeck 1938: 290; Adams 1967: 231 (as a synonym of Palaeochrysa concinnula). Type material. Holotype UCM 18625, deposited in UCM, collected by S.A. Rohwer; a nearly complete specimen in lateral aspect, covered with Canada balsam. Other examined material. FLFO 9745 (only part), collected by Julius Torres in 2013; a relatively well-preserved nearly complete specimen with all four wings overlapped. Type locality and horizon. USA: Colorado: Teller County, Florissant: Station 13B (Cockerell 1907b) [holotype]; Lower Shale unit of Evanoff et al. 2001 (precise collecting locality unknown) [specimen FLFO 9745]; Eocene, late Priabonian; Florissant Formation. Diagnosis. May be distinguished from other species of the genus by more distal 1r-m (clearly distad 2m-cu) [L. concinnula, L. wickhami, L. meyeri sp. nov.: ca. at level of 2m-cu]; 9–10 branches of RP [L. meyeri sp. nov.: 12 branches]; cells between branches of CuA distinctly longer than wide [L. wickhami: cells between these only slightly longer than wide]; hind wing RP1 distad first crossvein ra-rp [L. concinnula: proximad]. Redescription. Holotype (Fig. 17). Body, legs poorly preserved. Palpi partially preserved, but details not discernible. Eyes ca. 0.5 mm in diameter. Most part of antennae preserved; scapus large, slightly elongated. Forewing ca. 11.5 mm long, 3.9 wide (length to width ratio ca. 2.95). Costal space relatively narrow. Subcostal veinlets simple proximad pterostigmal region, widely spaced. Pterostigma indistinct. Distal part of Sc not discernible. Subcostal space broad; subcostal crossveins not preserved. RA long. RA space broad, with 10 preserved crossveins (apparently 11 when complete). RP originating relatively far from wing base (at ca. 0.28 of complete length). Anterior trace of RP somewhat zigzagged, with nine branches. Basal crossvein between RP, M (1r-m) rather long, connecting anterior trace of RP, MA within im at nearly half its length. M not fused with R basally; sigmoid before its fork; dividing to MA, MP at nearly level of origin of RP. MA forked distad Psc; deeply forked at Psc. Crossvein between MA, MP (1im) rather long. Im elongate, slightly divergent distally (length/width ratio 2.35). Psm poorly developed, zigzagged. Crossvein 2m-cu very long, connecting im, CuA at nearly proximal one-fourths of im. CuA probably with three simple branches. Psc rather well developed, slightly zigzagged. CuP deeply forked. 2icu connecting CuA, anterior branch of CuP proximad 2m-cu. CuA, A1 closely approaching for long distance. A1, A2 arched, simple. Crossvein between A2, A3 very long. Two gradate series of crossveins, nearly parallel: inner series with six preserved crossveins distad MA (apparently 8–9 complete); outer series with seven crossveins distad RP2. Hind wing ca. 10 mm long, ca. 3.5 mm wide. Costal, subcostal spaces poorly preserved; subcostal veinlets, subcostal crossveins not discernible. Pterostigma indistinct. RA fragmentarily preserved. RA space broad, with seven preserved crossveins. Anterior trace of RP zigzagged, with nine branches, of these three distal-most simple. Psm poorly discernible. MA fragmentarily preserved, deeply forked at Psc. MP nearly straight, deeply forked at Psc. Proximal crossvein between MA, MP (1im) long. CuA fused with MP for long distance; with one simple branch before fusion. CuP fragmentarily preserved. Anal veins not discernible. Psc probably well developed (poorly preserved). Two gradate series of crossveins, poorly preserved. Specimen FLFO 9745 (Figs 18, 19). Head: face, genae long; fourth, fifth segments of maxillary palpi long (Fig. 18B); eyes 0.4 mm in diameter; antennae rather well preserved, but details not discernible. Thorax (lateral view) poorly preserved. Legs covered with dense, short setae. Abdomen very poorly preserved, apical portion missing. Forewing 10.8 mm long, 3.5 wide (length to width ratio 3.09). Costal space relatively narrow; strongly narrowed towards pterostigmal region. Subcostal veinlets simple proximad pterostigmal region, rather widely spaced. Pterostigma indistinct. Distal part of Sc not discernible. Subcostal space moderately narrow; subcostal crossveins not discernible. RA long, ending on margin near wing apex. RA space broad, with 11 crossveins (left wing). Origin of RP relatively far from wing base (at ca. 0.26 of complete length). Anterior trace of RP zigzagged, apically not forked, with 10 branches; all forked except two (left wing) or three (right wing) distal-most. Basal crossvein between RP, M (1r-m) rather short, connecting anterior trace of RP, MA within im at proximal third im length. M not fused with R basally; sigmoid before fork; dividing to MA, MP at level of origin of RP. MA, MP each deeply forked at Psc. Crossvein between MA, MP (1im) rather long. Im elongate (length/width ratio 3.00–3.07); MA, MP within im not divergent distally. Psm very poorly developed. Crossvein 1m-cu short; 2m-cu rather long, connecting im, CuA at nearly proximal one-sixth (left wing) or one-ninth (right wing) of im. CuA probably with three simple branches. Psc rather well developed, slightly zigzagged. CuP deeply forked. 2icu connecting CuA, anterior branch of CuP proximad 2m-cu. A1, A2 arched, simple. Two gradate series of crossveins, nearly parallel; inner series slightly sigmoid, with nine crossveins distad MA; outer series nearly smooth, with eight crossveins distad RP2. Hind wing ca. 9.9 mm long, ca. 3.3 mm wide. Costal, subcostal spaces, Sc poorly discernible. RA long, ending on margin at wing apex. RA space rather broad, with ten (right wing) or nine (left wing) crossveins. Anterior trace of RP zigzagged, apically not forked, with nine branches, all forked except two distal-most. M dividing to MA, MP probably at level of origin of RP (poorly preserved). MA basally crossvein-like, then fused with RP for long distance, then deeply forked at Psc. Psm poorly developed, zigzagged. MP nearly straight proximally; deeply forked at Psc. Crossvein 1im long. Additional crossvein m-cu present in right wing. CuA fused with MP for long distance, with two simple branches, one before fusion, other after. CuP, A1, A2 distally discernible, all probably simple. Psc rather well preserved. Two gradate series of crossveins: inner series with eight (right wing) or nine (left wing) crossveins distad MA; outer series with seven (left wing) or eight (right wing) crossveins distad RP1. Remarks. The venation of the holotype and specimen FLFO 9745 agrees with the diagnosis of the species and is otherwise very similar, e.g., CuA in their hind wings each have one branch proximad its fusion with MP, a rare condition in the subfamily and unique among known Florissant Chrysopidae. We are confident that they are conspecific, differing only in small details.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.553
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicFossil Insects in AmberFrench-language works237,207