Bibliographic record
Abstract
Copelatus glyphicus (Say, 1823) Source of material. The five instar III larvae studied were associated with adults collected at the following locality: Canada. Québec, Trois-Rivières. Ephemeral pond in red maple forest at Chemin des Oblats, 06.VIII.1986, 08.VIII.1986, 12.VIII.1986; Y. Alarie leg. The identification is firm as C. glyphicus is the only Copelatus species known from that region. Diagnosis (instar III). The third instar of Copelatus glyphicus can easily be distinguished from that of the other species studied in this paper by the following combination of characters: HL = 0.80–0.90 mm; L3 <2.00 mm; U <0.40 mm; head capsule rounded, strongly constricted at level of occipital region (Fig. 19), scale-like sculpticels present over frontoclypeus and parietale; anterior margin of frontoclypeus broadly convex, extending mesally beyond level of adnasalia (Fig. 19); adnasalia margined with short bluntly rounded and truncated teeth (Fig. 63); MP2/MP1> 1.50; GA/MP1> 1.50; 1.30 <LP2/LP1 <1.90; inner margin of stipes lacking a dorsal linear row of spinulae; profemur with less than 3 PV and 4 AV secondary setae; metafemur with less than 3 AV secondary setae; urogomphus composed of one urogomphomere; U/HW <0.40; U/LAS <0.50; Nearctic. Description, instar III (Figs 19–20, 63) Body: Measurements and ratios aimed to characterize body shape are shown in Table 6. Head (Figs 19, 63): Head capsule rounded, strongly constricted at level of occiput; anterior margin of frontoclypeus broadly convex, extending beyond level of adnasalia; scale-like sculpticels well-developed both on frontoclypeus and parietale; adnasalia margined with short bluntly rounded and truncated teeth (Fig. 63); HL = 0.81–0.94 mm; A/MP = 1.34–1.38; MP/LP = 2.12–2.17; MP2/MP1 = 1.50–1.73; GA/MP1 = 1.79–1.88; LP2/LP1 = 1.40–1.56; MNL/MNW = 2.85–3.04. Thorax: L3 = 1.60–1.74 mm. Abdomen (Fig. 20): LAS = 0.65–0.74 mm; LAS subcylindrical, not constricted posteriorly at point of insertion of urogomphi. Urogomphus: U = 0.28–0.32 mm, composed of one urogomphomere; U/HW = 0.31–0.33; U/LAS = 0.42–0.44. Chaetotaxy: Parietale with 6–9 temporal spines; position and number of secondary setae on legs are shown in Table 7.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".