MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931739734 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7003356

Copelatus glyphicus NA

2022· article· en· W6931739734 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputability, Logic, AI Algorithms
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInstarEphemeral keyHead (geology)Margin (machine learning)Dorsum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Copelatus glyphicus (Say, 1823) Source of material. The five instar III larvae studied were associated with adults collected at the following locality: Canada. Québec, Trois-Rivières. Ephemeral pond in red maple forest at Chemin des Oblats, 06.VIII.1986, 08.VIII.1986, 12.VIII.1986; Y. Alarie leg. The identification is firm as C. glyphicus is the only Copelatus species known from that region. Diagnosis (instar III). The third instar of Copelatus glyphicus can easily be distinguished from that of the other species studied in this paper by the following combination of characters: HL = 0.80–0.90 mm; L3 <2.00 mm; U <0.40 mm; head capsule rounded, strongly constricted at level of occipital region (Fig. 19), scale-like sculpticels present over frontoclypeus and parietale; anterior margin of frontoclypeus broadly convex, extending mesally beyond level of adnasalia (Fig. 19); adnasalia margined with short bluntly rounded and truncated teeth (Fig. 63); MP2/MP1> 1.50; GA/MP1> 1.50; 1.30 <LP2/LP1 <1.90; inner margin of stipes lacking a dorsal linear row of spinulae; profemur with less than 3 PV and 4 AV secondary setae; metafemur with less than 3 AV secondary setae; urogomphus composed of one urogomphomere; U/HW <0.40; U/LAS <0.50; Nearctic. Description, instar III (Figs 19–20, 63) Body: Measurements and ratios aimed to characterize body shape are shown in Table 6. Head (Figs 19, 63): Head capsule rounded, strongly constricted at level of occiput; anterior margin of frontoclypeus broadly convex, extending beyond level of adnasalia; scale-like sculpticels well-developed both on frontoclypeus and parietale; adnasalia margined with short bluntly rounded and truncated teeth (Fig. 63); HL = 0.81–0.94 mm; A/MP = 1.34–1.38; MP/LP = 2.12–2.17; MP2/MP1 = 1.50–1.73; GA/MP1 = 1.79–1.88; LP2/LP1 = 1.40–1.56; MNL/MNW = 2.85–3.04. Thorax: L3 = 1.60–1.74 mm. Abdomen (Fig. 20): LAS = 0.65–0.74 mm; LAS subcylindrical, not constricted posteriorly at point of insertion of urogomphi. Urogomphus: U = 0.28–0.32 mm, composed of one urogomphomere; U/HW = 0.31–0.33; U/LAS = 0.42–0.44. Chaetotaxy: Parietale with 6–9 temporal spines; position and number of secondary setae on legs are shown in Table 7.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.950
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0040.009
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it