Entedonomphale esenini S. Triapitsyn 2005, sp. n.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Entedonomphale esenini sp. n. Figs 17, 18 Etymology: This species is named after Russian poet Sergei A. Esenin. Diagnosis: This species is defined based on the unique combination of the following morphological features: funicle segments of female antenna subequal and about as long as wide, each with several sensilla; midlobe of mesoscutum with 1 pair of setae; forewing disc hyaline, more or less evenly setose in the apical half (setae moderately long), bare in the basal half. Description: Female (holotype). Body brown, appendages mostly light brown. Vertexal suture distinct, angulate. Antenna (Fig. 17) with scape slender, about 4.0 x as long as wide; F1 and F2 subequal, about as long as wide and each with several sensilla; clava small, a little longer than funicle, about 1.9 x as long as wide, with several sensilla. Mesosoma a little shorter than metasoma, smooth. Midlobe of mesoscutum with 1 pair of setae; anterior margin of scutellum angulate. Forewing (Fig. 18) about 3.0 x as long as wide; longest marginal setae 0.45 x maximal forewing width; disc hyaline, more or less evenly setose in apical half of forewing (setae moderately long), bare in basal half. Hind wing about 6.0 x as long as wide; disc hyaline and with a few scattered setae; longest marginal setae almost equal to hind wing width. Hind coxa smooth. Petiole conspicuous, almost as wide as long. Ovipositor occupying about 1/2 length of gaster, not exserted; ovipositor length/metatibia length ratio about 1.1:1. Measurements (n=1, holotype). Body: 941.Antenna: scape: 109; pedicel: 54; F1: 31; F2: 31; clava: 78. Forewing: 675/227; longest marginal seta: 103. Hind wing: 595/100; longest marginal seta: 103. Ovipositor: 215. Male. Unknown. Holotype: female on slide, labelled: 1. “ MADAGASCAR: 43 km S Ambalauao, Rsrv. Andringintro, 22°14'S: 47°00'E, 5.x. 1993, 825 m, B.L. Fisher #747 (1)”; 2. “UC Davis (R. Burks loan) Mounted at UCR/ ERM by V.V. Berezovskiy 2004 in Canada balsam”; 3. (red) “ Entedonomphale esenini S. Triapitsyn HOLOTYPE ^” [UCDC]. Hosts: Unknown.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".