MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6931778580 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6256520

Scleroplax granulata Rathbun 1893

2006· article· en· W6931778580 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDigital Marketing and Social Media
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRange (aeronautics)Host (biology)Taxonomy (biology)Adult male

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Scleroplax granulata Rathbun, 1893 Type locality. Ensenada, Baja California, México. Previous known distribution and hosts. Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada to Punta Banda estuary, Ensenada, Baja California (Bonfil et al. 1992; Campos & Wicksten 1997). In burrows of the echiuroid Urechis caupo Fisher & MacGinitie, 1928, and the mud shrimps Neotrypaea californiensis (Dana, 1854), N. gigas (Dana, 1852) (new host record), and Upogebia pugettensis (Dana, 1852). Species Institution Austinixa sp. UABC Austinixa cristata (Rathbun, 1900) USNM Austinixa felipensis (Glassell, 1935) UABC Glassella costaricana (Wicksten, 1982) UABC AHF806 Indopinnixa sipunculana Manning and Morton, 1987 USNM221697, 222500 Pinnixa barnharti Rathbun, 1918 UABC, USNM31510, LACM35- 189.1 Pinnixa longipes (Lockington, 1876) USNM 110636 Pinnixa franciscana Rathbun, 1918 USNM 110633, 110671 Pinnixa tomentosa Lockington, 1877 Pinnixa littoralis Holmes, 1894 UABC Pinnixa schmitti Rathbun, 1918 USNM P. t u b i c o l a Holmes, 1894 USNM20860, UABC Pinnixa scamit Martin and Zmarzly, 1994 USNM 267500, UABC Pinnixa richardsoni Glassell, 1936 UABC Pinnixa valerii Rathbun, 1931 UABC, EMU3769 Pinnixa darwini Garth, 1960 AHF 3812 Pinnixa trasversalis (H. Milne Edwards and Lucas, 1844) UABC Pinnixa tumida Stimpson, 1858 UABC Pinnixa cf. occidentalis Rathbun, 1893 EMU 1416 Pinnixa pembertoni Glassell, 1935 UABC Pinnixa valdiviensis Rathbun, 1907 UABC (Photographs) Tetrias scabripes Rathbun, 1898 EMU- Pinnixa sp. EMU-842 Scleroplax granulata Rathbun, 1898 UABC, USNM17497 Scleroplax sp. UABC Material examined (UABC), new range and host: 10 males, 10 females, Punta Banda estuary, Ensenada, Baja California, 16 May 2006; in burrows of Neotrypea californiansi s and N. gigas (new host record) and 1 male, 1 female, same locality and date; in burrows of U. macginiteorum Williams, 1986 (new host record); 55 males, 54 females (24 ovigerous), 15–17 July 1999 and 6 males, 18 females (8 ovigerous), 16 September 1999, El Coyote estuary, Punta Abreojos, Baja California Sur, México; in burrows of N. californiansi s and N. gigas. Remarks. The present records extend the distribution of S. granulata about 1000 km southward, from Ensenada, Baja California to El Coyote estuary, Punta Abreojos, Baja California Sur, México and N. gigas as a new host. Hendrickx (1984, 1995), with some hesitation, recorded S. granulata as occurring in Estero El Verde, Sinaloa, México. The identification of the female specimen (EMU-842) on which Hendrickx based his report shows that it is instead an undescribed species of Pinnixa. The tip of the maxilliped dactylus of the new species clearly overreaches the tip of the propodus (Fig. 1 D), the flat carapace is transversally subrectangular and the WL3 is much longer than the other legs. Scleroplax granulata is a common commensal in the middle and low intertidal mud burrows of the echiurid Urechis caupo and the mud shimps N. californiensis, N. gigas and U. pugettensis (Garth & Abbott, 1980; present paper). Ricketts et al. (1985) recorded S. granulata in burrows of Upogebia sp., at Punta Banda estuary, Ensenada, Baja California, México. In this locality S. granulata has been collected in burrows of the only species of Upogebia, U. macginiteorum (see, Campos & Campos, 1989). Other crab species that live in burrows of the same hosts include Pinnixa franciscana Rathbun, 1918, and P. schmitti Rathbun, 1918 (Zmarzly 1992).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicDigital Marketing and Social Media→French-language works237,207→