MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931787403 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6084554

Alectorolophus impunctus Storozhenko et Kim, sp. nov.

2016· article· en· W6931787403 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRidgeVertex (graph theory)National parkQuarter (Canadian coin)Margin (machine learning)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alectorolophus impunctus Storozhenko et Kim, sp. nov. Figs 1–14 http://lsid.speciesfile.org/urn:lsid: Orthoptera.speciesfile.org:TaxonName:478434 Material examined. Holotype—male, Republic of Indonesia, prov. Sulawesi Tengah, National Park Lore Lindu, 75 km SE city Palu, environs of village Wuasa (near eastern park edge), 1,000 m, 7–12 February 2011, coll. A.V. Gorochov (ZISP). Paratypes: 6 males and 3 females, same data as in holotype; 4 males and 6 females, the same National Park but 45 km SSE city Palu, environs of village Tomado on Like Lindu, 1,000 m, 13–17 February 2011, coll. A.V. Gorochov (all paratypes in ZISP). Description. Male. Body rugose, medium-sized for the genus (Figs 1, 2). Head rugose, distinctly shorter than pronotum. Face in profile gentle reclinate (Fig. 2). Frontal ridge distinct to clypeal margin, deeply sulcate, widened above and between antennal bases but narrowing below median ocellus (Fig. 3). Vertex between eyes 1.3–1.4 times narrower than width of frontal ridge between antennae. Fastigium of vertex short, deeply sulcate; lateral margins bordered by low carinulae reaching apical 1/6 of compound eyes. Eyes large, oval; vertical diameter of eye 2.2–2.5 times as long as subocular furrow. Antennae 24-segmented, reaching basal quarter of hind femora; mid segments of antennae 2.5–3.0 times as long as width. Pronotum rugose, long, crossed by three transverse furrows; prozona 1.7– 1.8 times as long as metazona; anterior margin of prozona not excised near median carina; posterior margin of metazona angularly rounded (Fig. 1); lateral carinae absent; median carina distinct, lateral view crest-like, deeply cut by 3 furrows, forming three triangle teeth (Fig. 2). Prosternal spine straight, conical, with pointed apex (Fig. 8). Mesosternal lobes subsquare, 1.1 times as wide as long; mesosternal interspace trapezoid; metasternal lobes separated (Fig. 7). Tegmina touching each other in a resting position, reaching posterior margin of 4–5th tergites, rounded apex; radial area with irregular veinlets. Hind wings shorter than tegmina. Hind femora moderately stout, 4.1–4.3 times as long as their maximal width; dorso-median carina slightly serrated, terminating in a small tooth; ventral genicular lobes obtuse (Fig. 2). Hind tibiae with 8 outer and 9 inner dorsal spines; outer apical dorsal spine absent. Hind tarsi short, not longer than the half of hind tibiae; third segment (without claws) as long as two others together; arolium large, almost reaching apex of claws. Tympanum large, oval. 10th tergite without furculae on posterior margin. Supra-anal plate triangular, 1.2 times as long as its width near base, with narrowly rounded apex; median sulcus deep, reaching apex of plate (Fig. 10). Cerci conical, 2.1 times as long as their width near base. Subgenital plate short, curved up, apex narrowed, rounded (Fig. 9). Epiphallus bridge-like, undivided; ancorae short; lophi of epiphallus lobe-like; oval sclerite absent (Fig. 14). Valves of cingulum narrow, strongly sclerotized apically; apical valves of penis very long and distinctly curved up; basal valves of penis connected with apical ones by flexure; rami of cingulum narrow, curved; posterior margin of zygoma straight; apodemes broad (Figs. 12, 13). Based on the colored images of other species of Alectorolophus (Eades et al., 2016), this species is likely to have bright coloration, but it was affected by alcohol preservation and the present of black and light patterns only is given below. Body light brown with black marks (Figs 1, 2). Dorsal side of head black, except light brown fastigium of vertex; genae black with light brown stripe along lower margin; face light brown with black stripes below the base of antennae; mandibles black (Fig. 3). Antennae light brown. Pronotum black with narrow light stripe along anterior margin of prozona, anterior and lower margins of lateral lobes; posterior margin of lateral lobes with broad light stripe; metazona completely light. Tegmina black, without stripes or spots; hind wings black. Fore and mid legs light brown. Hind femur light brown, without any dark marks; dorsal genicular lobes blackish brown, ventral genicular lobes light brown. Hind tibia light brown; dorsal spines with black apex. Abdomen dorsally light brown with a few small dark spots; 10th tergite and anal plate blackish; cerci light brown. Ventrally 1–8th sternites light brown with transverse blackish stripes along posterior margins; 9th sternite and subgenital plate blackish brown. Female. Similar to male, but larger and more robust (Figs. 4, 5). Head as in male, but vertex between eyes 1.4– 1.5 times narrower than width of frontal ridge between antennae, and vertical diameter of eye 1.7–1.8 times as long as subocular furrow. Antennae 25-segmented, reaching the base of hind femora; mid segments of antennae 3.2–3.8 times as long as wide. Pronotum as in male, but prozona 1.6–1.8 times as long as metazona (Fig. 4). Prosternal spine and mesosternal lobes as in male; metasternal lobes distinctly separated. Tegmina touching each other in rest position (Fig. 4), reaching posterior margin of 4th tergites, with rounded apex; radial area with irregular veinlets. Hind wings shorter than tegmina. Hind femora 4.0–4.3 times as long as their maximal width; dorso-median carina slightly serrated, terminating in a small tooth; ventral genicular lobes obtuse (Fig. 5). Hind tibiae with 7–8 outer and 9 inner dorsal spines; outer apical dorsal spine absent. Hind tarsi as in male. Tympanum large, oval. Supra-anal plate narrowly triangular, 1.4–1.5 times as long as its width near the base; median sulcus in basal half deep, in apical part shallow. Cerci conical, 2.0 times as long as their width near base. Subgenital plate 1.4–1.5 times as long as wide, with triangle pointed apex (Fig. 11). Basivalvular plates long. Ovipositor short, upper margin of dorsal valves and lower margin of ventral valves excised (Fig. 5). Body (after alcohol preservation) brown with black and light brown marks (Figs 4, 5). Dorsal side of head black, except light brown fastigium of vertex; genae black with light brown spots; face and mandibles black with light brown marks (Fig. 6). Antennae light brown. Pronotum light brown with narrow dark brown stripe along the median carina; metazona completely dark brown (Fig. 4); lateral lobes with large dark brown or blackish central spot (Fig. 5). Tegmina blackish brown, without stripes or spots; hind wings blackish. Fore and mid legs light brown. Hind femur light brown; dorsal side with three brown spots situated at the base, near the middle and in apical part of femur; ventral side of femur dark brown; dorsal genicular lobes blackish brown, ventral genicular lobes brown. Hind tibia light brown; dorsal spines with black apex. Abdomen dorsally brown with numerous dark marks; anal plate, cerci and sternites colored as in male; subgenital plate blackish brown. Ovipositor brown. Measurements (mm). Length of body: male 16.9–17.2, female 25.0–25.9; antenna: male 13.5, female 14.0; pronotum: male 4.7–4.8, female 7.2–8.4; tegmen: male 5.2–5.5, female 8.2–9.1; hind femur: male 11.1–11.2, female 15.0–16.1; ovipositor 3.2–3.5. Distribution. Endemic to Sulawesi Island (province Sulawesi Tengah). Diagnosis. The difference of a new species from congeners is given below in the keys for males and females. Etymology. The name of the new species is derived from Latin ‘im-punctus’ (without spots).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.606
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlFrench-language works237,207