MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931798852 · doi:10.5683/sp2/sjwlpk

Enquête longitudinale auprès des parents séparés et recomposés du Québec

2020· dataset· fr· W6931798852 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueEspaceINRS (National Institute for Scientific Research (Canada)) · 2020
Typedataset
Languagefr
Field
Topic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoUniversité du Québec à Trois-RivièresUniversité du Québec à MontréalUniversité de SherbrookeUniversité LavalUniversité de MontréalUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocioeconomic statusAffect (linguistics)Data collectionPopulationAttendance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet ensemble de données regroupe les métadonnées en lien avec l'Enquête longitudinale auprès des parents séparés et recomposés du Québec. Il contient les questionnaires pour le volet parent et le volet beau-parent, les dictionnaires des variables pour les données parent, beau-parent et les variables économiques, ainsi que les documents d'opérationnalisation des variables.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.102

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.019
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.014
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEspaceINRS (National Institute for Scientific Research (Canada))French-language works237,207