Figure 3 in Neither slugs nor snails: a molecular reappraisal of the gastropod family Velutinidae
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Figure 3. Phylogenetic relationships of the family Velutinidae (Bayesian tree based on the combined dataset) showing clades A–L expanded. Numbers at nodes indicate branch support values [posterior probability (PP) and ultrafast bootstrap (UFb) values, respectively]; support values are shown only when at least one of them is ≥ 80%; white circles at nodes indicate maximum support (PP = 1, Ufb = 100). Boxes indicate hypothetical species; dashed lines indicate possible alternative species partitions. Coloured boxes on the right indicate genera, and white boxes indicate subfamilies. Letters at the end of sample codes broadly indicate the area of origin: AK, Alaska; ANT, Antarctica; AR, Argentina; BC, British Columbia; BRE, Bretagne; CA, California; CH, China; COR, Corse; CR, Costa Rica; FL, Florida; GF, French Guiana; GP, Guadeloupe; HI, Hawaii; IT, Italy; MG, Madagascar; MQ, Martinique; MX, Mexico; MZ, Mozambique; NC, New Caledonia; NL, Newfoundland; NO, Norway; OR, Oregon; PA, Panama; PF, French Polynesia; PG, Papua New Guinea; PH, Philippines; QLS, Queensland; RE, Reunion; SA, Saudi Arabia; SP, Spain; TAS, Tasmania; TW, Taiwan; VU, Vanuatu; WA, Washington State; ZNZ, Zanzibar.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".