MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931818973 · doi:10.5284/1100506

A Mid-Victorian Century Stable Block at The Manor House Mears Ashby, Northamptonshire (NGR 483727, 266644) Historic Building Record

2021· article· en· W6931818973 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueArchaeology Data Service · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Architecture and Urbanism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlock (permutation group theory)Period (music)EthosQuarter (Canadian coin)Ground floorScale (ratio)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On the 16th March 2021, an 'as found' photographic record was made of a 19th century stable block at The Manor House, Mears Ashby, prior to alterations to the building. The building falls within the grade II listed curtilage of the 18th century Manor House. The stable block is a rectangular, 3 bay, single storey structure, brick-built with slated roof. It was formerly a two-storey building, comprised of harness room, loose box and stalls on the ground floor, with hay loft above. Consent was granted in 1977 to reduce the upper storey. The proposed development will return the building to a two-storey structure for use as a workshop and store. The interior of the stable block witnessed refurbishment and alterations post-2005, and consequently very few original fixtures and fittings survive. The report provides a descriptive and illustrative account of observations, by means of digital photographs, scale drawings and plans showing the direction of view of each photograph. Comparative analysis shows that the building, in many ways, conformed to prevailing ethos of the period for good stable design. It is considered that the building is likely to have been erected in the mid-Victorian period, quite possibly in the late 1870s.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.565
Threshold uncertainty score0.876

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0420.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchaeology Data ServiceSame topicHistorical Architecture and UrbanismFrench-language works237,207