MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6931822635 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6869765

Sorex monticolus Merriam 1890

2018· article· en· W6931822635 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubspeciesShrewSorexSubgenusHolotypeTaxonomy (biology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

86. Montane Shrew Sorex monticolus French: Musaraigne sombre / German: Dunkle Rotzahnspitzmaus / Spanish: Musarafa de montana Other common names: Dusky Shrew, Mountain Shrew Taxonomy. Sorex monticolus Merriam, 1890, “ San Francisco Mountain, Arizona. Altitude 3,500 meters (11,500 feet),” Coconino County, Arizona, USA. Restricted by L. N. Carraway in 2007 to “latitude 33.70°N, longitude 108.96°W.” Widely used subspecific name longicaudus has been changed as the original name longicauda is a noun and thus invariable. Sorex monticolusis in the S. monticolus group along with S. neomexicanus and subgenus Otisorex. Sorex neomexicanus might be a synonym or subspecies of S. monticolus based on genetic data, although morphometric data support its specific status and it is recognized as distinct here until additional research is conducted. Sorex monticolus itself is largely paraphyletic because populations tend to fall into three major clades: Northern, Southern, and Coastal. Northern and Southern clades often group together with S. neomexicanus, and the Coastal clade is closest to S. pacificus and S. bairdi. Additional research is needed to resolve this paraphyly. Subspecific taxonomyis clearly in need of future research. Fourteen subspecies recognized. Subspecies and Distribution. S.m.monticolusMerriam,1890—C&EArizonaandWNewMexico(SWUSA)StoDurango(WMexico). S.m.alascensisMerriam,1895—W&SAlaskaincludingmanyoffshoreIs(USA). S.m.calvertensisCowan,1941—CalvertIoffWBritishColumbia(WCanada). S.m.elassodonOsgood,1901—QueenCharlotteIsoffWBritishColumbia(WCanada)andSAlaska(USA). S.m.insularisCowan,1941—S.m.IintheBardswellGroupoffWBritishColumbia(WCanada). S.m.isolatusH.H.T.Jackson,1922—VancouverI(SWCanada). S.m.longicaudaMerriam,1895—coastalSAlaska(USA)andWCBritishColumbia(WCanada). S.m.malitiosusH.H.T.Jackson,1919—WarrenIoffSAlaska(USA). S.m.obscurusMerriam,1895—NAlaskathroughWCanada(includingNWSaskatchewan)andWUSAfromNWashingtonandMontanaStoNewMexico(includingtheECaliforniaMts). S.m.parvidensH.H.T.Jackson,1921—SCalifornia(SWUSA). S.m.prevostensisOsgood,1901—Prevost(Kunghit)IintheQueenCharlotteIsoffWBritishColumbia(SWCanada). S.m.setosusElliot,1899—NWWashington(NWUSA)andtheSWcoastofBritishColumbia(SWCanada). S.m.shumaginensisMerriam,1900—PopofIintheShumaginIsoffSAlaska(USA). S. m. soperi R. M. Anderson & Rand, 1945 — C Saskatchewan and SW Manitoba (SC Canada). Descriptive notes. Head—body 53-76 mm, tail 42-61 mm, hindfoot 11-16 mm; weight 4-10 g. The Montane Shrew is medium-sized and hard to distinguish from the Vagrant Shrew (8. vagrans). Dorsum is brown to dark brown, occasionally with reddish tinge. Venter is buffy brown to grayish and is paler than dorsum. Tail is long, narrow, tipped with fur at end, and distinctly bicolored, being brown above and lighter below. Upper incisors are well pigmented and have pigmented tines; these teeth also have three denticles and wide interdenticular spaces. Teeth are pigmented dark red. There are five unicuspids, third is smaller than fourth, and fifth is minute. Habitat. Mostly alpine and boreal forests and coastal coniferous forests, associated with moist areas such as around streams or near bogs, being largely associated with riparian zones. In Mexico, Montane Shrews are found in montane pine-oak forests and can be found in spruce-fir and fir-larch forests in some regions. They typically are not found in open regions because of competition with Vagrant Shrews, but they are occasionally found in grassy meadows surrounded by forest. They are occasionally found in alpine tundra and sphagnum bogs. Food and Feeding. Seventy-seven to 99% of diets of Montane Shrews consist of various small invertebrates and conifer seeds, although fungi, lichens, and other plant material have also been recorded in diets. Soft-bodied invertebrates (earthworms, snails, slugs, etc.) and insect larvae make up significant proportion of diets, and maximum size of prey is ¢.30 mm. Foraging occurs along the ground by rummaging through leaf litter until prey is located. Breeding. Male Montane Shrews start to become reproductively active in mid-winter, and females become reproductively active around March. Although timing of reproduction can vary widely throughout a population, young are generally born in spring and summer. Litters have 2-9 young (average 6-4 young), and gestation lasts c.21 days. Females have postpartum estrus. Young are weaned at c¢.3 weeks old. Females can have 3—4 litters/season but do not generally survive to a second breeding season. Some young born early can breed in the same season they were born. Most individuals do not live past 16 months. Activity patterns. Montane Shrews are active throughout the day and year, but they can be more active at night similarly to other northern shrews. Nests are composed of dried grass and are spherical, being about the size of a human's fist. They use tunnels and runways to get around quickly. They might use echolocation to get around similarly to the Vagrant Shrew, although this has yet to be investigated. Movements, Home range and Social organization. Montane Shrews are solitary and highly territorial. Males have significantly larger home ranges during the breeding season (4020 m?in British Columbia) than females (1227 m? in British Columbia) because males drastically expand their home ranges to breed with as many females as possible. Densities and population size vary largely throughout the year, being highest during the breeding season and lowestjust before it because older adults die off in autumn after breeding and younger individuals overwinter to the next breeding season. Densities have been recorded at 12 ind/ha in autumn. Status and Conservation. Classified as Least Concern on The IUCN Red List. The Montane Shrew is widespread and common, although it might be affected by local deforestation and urban development in some regions. Bibliography. Alexander (1996), Carraway (2007), Demboski & Cook (2001), Esteva et al. (2010), Hawes (1976, 1977), Ingles (1960), Smith & Belk (1996), Terry (1981), Tobon (2014a).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling→French-language works237,207→