MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6931845477 · doi:10.5683/sp2/5fjmgo

Trace gas fluxes of a High Arctic wetland across the growing season

2021· dataset· en· W6931845477 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueBorealis · 2021
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicUsability and User Interface Design
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrace gasArcticWetlandGrowing seasonHydrology (agriculture)WatershedThe arctic

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The data set was collected as an ongoing study at the Cape Bounty Arctic Watershed Observatory examining the environmental controls over spatial patterns of soil nitrogen availability in a High Arctic wet sedge meadow and how they influence trace gas release exchange processes. These data files contain trace gas fluxes (CO2, CH4, and N2O) and accompanying nutrient and environmental data from a High Arctic wetland across the growing season from 2017 to 2018. Trace gas samples were collected using methods from Wagner et al (2019) and analyzed using gas chromatography.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: Dataset
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.175

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBorealisSame topicUsability and User Interface DesignFrench-language works237,207